Institute for New Economic Thinking
The Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) is focused on the thorough exploration of fresh economic ideas and approaches that tackle the critical issues facing society today. We promote effective economic concepts aimed at benefiting humanity. Established in 2009, we operate as a nonpartisan, nonprofit entity that champions forward-thinking initiatives in several key areas: the connection between finance and the overall economy, issues of inequality and distribution, the economics of innovation, and the sustainability of our environment and resources. We are in the process of creating a worldwide network of innovative economic thinkers, supported by our grantees, research collaborations, partnerships with top universities and organizations, prominent events, and a rising number of student-led movements. We also offer interactive educational resources at no cost to audiences around the globe. Our efforts are informed by historical context and draw from multiple disciplines. We recognize that complexity and uncertainty are fundamental aspects of economic and financial systems, and we challenge theories that wrongly assume people always act in rational and predictable ways. Conventional economics has its shortcomings. Our aim is to provide optimistic solutions to the significant challenges of the 21st century.
Outlet metrics
Global
#375367
United States
#267905
Law and Government/Government
#5005
Articles
-
3 days ago |
ineteconomics.org | Lynn Parramore
There’s a familiar myth in American politics: that of the no-nonsense business leader who cuts through red tape and gets results. It fuels the belief that running a country is just like running a company — and that executives, with their boardroom instincts and bottom-line mindset, are exactly what government needs. But that myth collapses under the weight of what corporate leadership has actually become — and what happens when it migrates into public office.
-
3 weeks ago |
ineteconomics.org | Lynn Parramore
For the last 40 years, millions upon millions of hard-working Americans have been clocking in, doing their part — and getting less in return. They are very upset, as well they should be. Wages have stalled. Job security’s a joke. Yet corporate profits are sky high. Just look at the scoreboard: In 2024, Apple raked in $93.7 billion, Alphabet (Google’s parent company) pulled in $100.1 billion, and ExxonMobil reaped $33.6 billion.
-
1 month ago |
ineteconomics.org | Lynn Parramore
April 19th marks the 250th anniversary of the Revolutionary War’s start, with the first battles taking place in Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. You’ve probably got a solid idea of what kicked it all off — a fight for liberty, right? Well, not so fast, says historian Marc Egnal. The “fight for liberty” narrative is a nice story, but it doesn’t quite hold up when you dig into the real reasons behind the American Revolution.
-
1 month ago |
ineteconomics.org | Lynn Parramore
In a series of high-level discussions in Rome and Berlin, Thomas Ferguson—a leading authority on money and politics—offered a sweeping analysis of the deeper forces driving President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda. Far from a spur-of-the-moment decision, Trump’s economic moves reflect a broader political realignment and years of behind-the-scenes preparation.
-
1 month ago |
ineteconomics.org | Lynn Parramore
Early in her chilling account of life as a Facebook executive, Sara Wynn-Williams drops an intriguing detail: Mark Zuckerberg’s favorite president. The young founder – still in his twenties at the time — picks Andrew Jackson, because he “got stuff done.” “What about Lincoln or Roosevelt” the author asks the boss. Didn’t they get stuff done, too? Zuckerberg insists: “It’s Jackson.
Contact details
Address
123 Example Street
City, Country 12345
Phone
+1 (555) 123-4567
Contact Forms
Contact Form
Website
http://ineteconomics.orgTry JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →