Where are the numbers

2 weeks ago | wherearethenumbers.substack.com | Norman Fenton

When MHRA rejected Cheryl Grainger’s FOI request for the data they held about covid vaccine adverse reactions in pregnancy, they cited a Section 22 exemption. This “provides an exemption for information that is intended to be published in the future”. Specifically, the MHRA argued that the data could not be revealed until it was published in a peer-reviewed journal, since otherwise it could be misintepreted and possibly ‘encourage vaccine hesitancy’.

2 months ago | wherearethenumbers.substack.com | Norman Fenton

Thank you for reporting. How dreadful. This prompts me to recall a transcript which readers may find relevant to this instance of what I can only call mega gaslighting:"The death of a 40 year old from 'natural causes'"911 Jeddi, April 26, 2021https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SywpFQun-owTRANSCRIPTTRANSCRIBER'S NOTES: The screen shows a screenshot of Sara Holub's social media post of March 22, 2021 and then of her obituary. We do not see the speaker; he has a New York accent.

2 months ago | wherearethenumbers.substack.com | Norman Fenton

Imagine Jane is found dead after being shot in the heart from behind by a known violent criminal Victor. While we know the shot would have killed Jane, it is theoretically possible that she could have died of a purely coincidental heart attack immediately before the bullet entered her heart. Now imagine further that a judge rules that Victor did not murder Jane because ‘on the balance of probabilites’ she died of a heart attack before the bullet struck.

2 months ago | wherearethenumbers.substack.com | Martin Neil

Great work. 1) "Use of the arbitrary miscategorisation type was ubiquitous, identified in 100% of the reviewed studies. "Think this is a typo. Needs to specify this is only true of observational studies. 2) I don't see Polack in the table. Is Moderna's original trial also absent? And if so, why did the search method not turn these two RCT's up?

2 months ago | wherearethenumbers.substack.com | Martin Neil

We reported last month that our paper on the cheap trick, whereby those vaccinated are miscategorised as unvaccinated in covid ‘vaccine’ studies, had been rejected by the ‘Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice’.