-
5 days ago | 
jurishour.in | Mariya Paliwala |Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Union government is preparing to introduce an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court in the upcoming Parliament session. The development comes after a Supreme Court-appointed probe panel reportedly found incriminating evidence linked to the recovery of a large amount of burnt cash from Justice Varma’s official residence in Delhi. The scandal has triggered significant political and judicial ripples.
-
5 days ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued notices to several senior administrative officials in connection with an alleged attempt to illegally seize land in Jhanjheri village, Mohali, using fake possession warrants. The court action follows a petition filed by a local farmer, Ram Singh, who claims the land belongs to the village’s gram panchayat.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Delhi High Court has held that the Amazon Web is not liable to pay Royalty on rendering cloud computing services to Indian Entities. The bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Tejas Karia has observed that the Assessee’s customers do not acquire any right of using the infrastructure and software of the Assessee for the purposes of commercial exploitation.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
This article is written by Unnati V. Chhangani, a Fourth Year Law Student, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur. The Calcutta High Court has directed the reconsideration of the relaxation in educational qualification for Compassionate Appointment.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Mariya Paliwala |Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
This article is written by Unnati V. Chhangani, a Fourth Year Law Student, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur. The Calcutta High Court held that once judgement is pronounced judgement, Court has no jurisdiction to alter it. The Single bench of Justice Prasenjit Biswas observed that, the powers of review cannot be exercised as an inherent power nor can an appellate power can be exercised in the guise of power of review.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
This article is written by Unnati V. Chhangani, a Fourth Year Law Student, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur. The Supreme Court ruled that policy decisions relating to economic and administrative considerations, such as fiscal viability and sustainable pension costs, are a matter for policymakers and should not be taken into account unless they are considered as unconstitutional. The division bench of Justice Abhay S.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Delhi High Court quashed an income tax reassessment notice of Panch Tatva Promoters Pvt. Ltd. for the Assessment Year 2019–20 under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the notice was legally untenable as it had no relevant material for the prescribed assessment period.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has introduced new amendments to the Goods and Services Tax (GST) system, focusing on the refund mechanism. These new additions are part of the Central Goods and Services Tax (Second Amendment) Rules, 2025, and will be effective from May 2025. The moves aim to increase transparency, streamline compliance, and minimize recurring tax conflicts. Major GST Refund and Appeal Process Changes 1.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Mariya Paliwala |Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has extended the date of filing of Income Tax Returns (ITRs) due for filing by 31st July 2025 to 15th September 2025. In view of the extensive changes introduced in the notified Income Tax Returns (ITRs) and considering the time required for system readiness and rollout of ITR utilities for Assessment Year (AY) 2025-26, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has decided to extend the due date for filing returns.
-
1 week ago | 
jurishour.in | Amit Sharma |amit sharmA
The Supreme Court ruled that Section 27 of the Customs Act is not applicable when the refund sought is wrongly invoked by bank. The Division bench of Justice Abhay S. Oka And Justice Ujjal Bhuyan observed that Section 27 of the Customs Act and Section 11B of the Central Excise Act deal with the question of refund. Refund can be denied either in part or wholly by applying the doctrine of unjust enrichment.
