-
Jan 6, 2025 | 02765-9/fulltext?rss=yes&sz=64)
europeanurology.com | Andrew J. Vickers
Get full text accessLog in, subscribe or purchase for full access. ReferencesHoogenboom, B.J. ∙ Manske, R.C.How to write a scientific articleInt J Sports Phys Ther. 2012; 7:512-517Sullivan, G.M. ∙ Simpson, D. ∙ Yarris, L.M. ... Writing author response letters that get editors to “yes”J Grad Med Educ. 2019; 11:119-1233. Vyas, D.A. ∙ Eisenstein, L.G. ∙ Jones, D.S.Hidden in plain sight – reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithmsN Engl J Med. 2020; 383:874-8824. Assel, M. ∙ Sjoberg, D.
-
Sep 6, 2024 | 
avsforum.com | Andrew J. Vickers
I'm swapping a turntable with no ground with my late dad's turntable with a ground wire. TT location is actually on the opposite side of the room that already has a long RCA cable routed through the floor and into my AV rack in the closet. Are there other "terminals" I could ground the TT to get rid of the hum? I've read grounding to active speakers (which I don't have) or to an outlet faceplate screw. I've tried the faceplate but still have a hum/buzz.
-
Aug 26, 2024 | 
avsforum.com | Andrew J. Vickers
Anyone move to this X.X.6 layout and happy with the results?
-
Aug 15, 2024 | 
avsforum.com | Andrew J. Vickers
#1 · I'm upgrading my AVR to take advantage of Audyssey MultEQ XT32. I currently have a 5.1.2 setup with the .2 being top middle in-ceiling speakers. I know there will be benefit of adding an additional sub, which I plan to do, but I'm wondering any major benefit of adding an additional .2 atmos speakers when the only location I could add would be front height? Opinions?
-
Jun 6, 2024 | 
journals.sagepub.com | Andrew J. Vickers |Paul Bennett
This article is a collaboration between a British primary care physician (P.B.) and a US-based methodologist with an interest in decision analysis (A.V.). Both of us are strong advocates of shared decision making (SDM) but have independently concluded that many contemporary approaches to SDM, especially those involving decision aids, do not actually follow good SDM practice at all.
-
May 25, 2024 | 02385-6/abstract?rss=yes&sz=64)
europeanurology.com | Andrew J. Vickers
The paper by Baboudjian et al [ 1 Baboudjian M, Diamand R, Uleri A, et al. Does overgrading on targeted biopsy of magnetic resonance imaging–visible lesions in prostate cancer lead to overtreatment? Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.02.003. ] is a good example of both a “straw man argument” and urology researchers’ unfortunate obsession with intermediate endpoints instead of cancer morbidity and mortality.
-
Apr 26, 2024 | 02317-0/fulltext?rss=yes&sz=64)
europeanurology.com | Jim C. Hu |Andrew J. Vickers |Edward Schaeffer
We appreciate the thoughtful comments from Rosen et al on our article [[1]Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging–targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015. ] and other randomized trials comparing transrectal to transperineal prostate biopsy.
-
Apr 26, 2024 | 02314-5/fulltext?rss=yes&sz=64)
europeanurology.com | Jim C. Hu |Andrew J. Vickers |Edward Schaeffer
We agree with the points made by Chiu et al [[1]Chiu PKF, Wu X, Gandaglia G, European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Party. Beyond statistical significance: unveiling the advantages of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsies. Eur Urol. In press. ] in their Platinum Priority editorial on our article [[2]Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME, et al.
-
Apr 25, 2024 | 02319-4/fulltext?rss=yes&sz=64)
europeanurology.com | Jim C. Hu |Edward Schaeffer |Andrew J. Vickers
We are grateful for the thoughtful comments from Dr. Giannakodimos on our article [[1]Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015. ] and the opportunity to reply.
-
Apr 9, 2024 | 02134-1/fulltext?rss=yes&sz=64)
europeanurology.com | Jim C. Hu |Andrew J. Vickers |Edward Schaeffer
We thank Marra et al for their laudatory comments on our study [[1]Hu JC, Assel M, Allaf ME, et al. Transperineal versus transrectal magnetic resonance imaging – targeted and systematic prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: the PREVENT randomized trial. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.015. ], and we welcome the opportunity to address the thoughtful points they presented.
