
Andrew Lidbetter
Articles
-
Jan 23, 2025 |
herbertsmithfreehills.com | Nusrat Zar |James Wood |Andrew Lidbetter |Jasveer Randhawa
In R (on the application of Shashikanth) v NHS Litigation Authority & Anor [2024] EWCA Civ 1477 the Court of Appeal held that an adjudicator's decision determining a contract dispute was subject to judicial review where the broader context and ultimate source of power was statutory. In doing so the court gave helpful guidance on the availability of judicial review in situations involving both public law and contractual rights.
-
Jan 20, 2025 |
herbertsmithfreehills.com | Nusrat Zar |James Wood |Andrew Lidbetter |Jasveer Randhawa
The Government has made much of its recent "AI Opportunities Action Plan" ("the Action Plan"), with all the positive rhetoric focusing on how transformative and exciting AI will be in the coming years. A key limb of this is the intention to scale up the use of AI in the public sector, i.e. by public bodies subject to public law requirements and with significant power over the lives and businesses of individuals and commercial organisations.
-
Jan 8, 2025 |
herbertsmithfreehills.com | Nusrat Zar |James Wood |Andrew Lidbetter |Jasveer Randhawa
A Scottish court has confirmed that the consents for the Jackdaw and Rosebank North Sea oil and gas projects should be quashed as being unlawful for failing to assess the environmental effects of downstream emissions. This is in line with the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Finch last year (see our blog on Finch here).
-
Oct 14, 2024 |
lexology.com | Nusrat Zar |James H Wood |Andrew Lidbetter |Jasveer Randhawa
In R (Elliott Associates and Elliott International) v The London Metal Exchange and LME Clear [2024] EWCA Civ 1168 the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal concerning the cancellation of nickel trades, despite disagreeing with the judgment below on a number of key issues of wider application.
-
Jun 20, 2024 |
lexology.com | Andrew Lidbetter |Nusrat Zar |James H Wood |Jasveer Randhawa
The Supreme Court has delivered its highly anticipated judgment in R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council and others [2024] UKSC 20. It has held, by a majority, that emissions resulting from the eventual use of refined products from a proposed oil development, known as downstream emissions, should have been assessed in the environmental impact assessment process.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →