Anthony F. Pipa

Feb 4, 2025 | lawfaremedia.org | George Ingram |Anthony F. Pipa |Jonathan D. Katz

Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With Today’s episode is a recording of Feb. 3 livestream that Senior Editor Scott R. Anderson hosted with George Ingram and Tony Pipa, both Senior Fellows in Global Economy and Development at the Brookings Institution, and Jonathan Katz, Senior Director of the Anti-Corruption, Democracy, and Security project also at Brookings—all three of whom are also alumni of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

Feb 3, 2025 | lawfaremedia.org | George Ingram |Jonathan D. Katz |Anthony F. Pipa

Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With On Feb.

Jan 22, 2025 | brookings.edu | Mark Muro |Anthony F. Pipa

President Donald Trump signed an avalanche of executive orders on his first day in office, consuming policymakers’ and the media’s attention. Meanwhile, former President Joe Biden’s very last executive order on economic policy—issued on January 19, the last full day of his tenure—has gone relatively unnoticed. Yet Biden’s order—on “helping left-behind communities make a comeback”—merits attention.

Jan 6, 2025 | brookings.edu | Anthony F. Pipa

As the Trump administration prepares to take power in Washington, Senior Fellow Tony Pipa, host of the Reimagine Rural podcast, looks at what has happened in rural policy under the Biden administration and what shifts in federal policy and emphasis might ensue under President Trump. No matter what changes come, Pipa notes, local communities will continue to solve problems locally. This episode is a replay of an interview Tony did on The Current podcast in late December.

Oct 28, 2024 | brookings.edu | Anthony F. Pipa

With the major-party nominations for vice president featuring two candidates with authentic rural roots, prospects seemed promising for a policy debate during the campaign about the role that the federal government can play in helping rural America prosper. Yet neither of the moderators during the vice-presidential debate on October 1 even uttered the word “rural,” and despite the forum’s much-praised focus on substance, none of it touched specifically on rural policy.