Aron C. Beezley

2 days ago | jdsupra.com | Aron C. Beezley |Nathaniel J. Greeson

Bradley has been publishing an ongoing survey of state-level bid protest processes and procedures. For the next state in this series, we focus on the bid protest procedures in Arizona. Any interested party may file a protest challenging: A solicitation, A determination that a bid or proposal is not susceptible to award, or The award of a contract.

2 days ago | jdsupra.com | Aron C. Beezley |Nathaniel J. Greeson

Bradley has been publishing an ongoing survey of state-level bid protest processes and procedures. For the next state in this series, we focus on the protest process in Utah. What Rules Apply? Protests of state-level agency procurements in Utah are generally governed by Utah Code Ann. §§ 63G-6a-1602-03 and Utah Admin. Code R33-16.

2 days ago | jdsupra.com | Aron C. Beezley |Nathaniel J. Greeson

In Nevada’s competitive public procurement landscape, contractors and vendors invest substantial time and resources to secure government contracts. When a bid is unsuccessful — especially when there’s a suspicion of procedural errors or unfair treatment — the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) provide a formal avenue for challenge. Nevada law allows a person who submitted an unsuccessful bid or proposal to file an “appeal” challenging the contract award.

3 days ago | natlawreview.com | Aron C. Beezley

In Nevada’s competitive public procurement landscape, contractors and vendors invest substantial time and resources to secure government contracts. When a bid is unsuccessful — especially when there’s a suspicion of procedural errors or unfair treatment — the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) provide a formal avenue for challenge. Nevada law allows a person who submitted an unsuccessful bid or proposal to file an “appeal” challenging the contract award.

3 days ago | jdsupra.com | Aron C. Beezley |Gabrielle Sprio

The U.S. Court of Federal Claims recently issued a significant opinion in Gemini Tech Servs., LLC v. United States, holding that the Army’s failure to follow required procedures under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) in establishing a competitive range for a logistics support procurement at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, prejudiced the protestor and warranted injunctive relief.