Barry M. Hartman

May 13, 2024 | mondaq.com | Barry M. Hartman |Theodore Kornobis |Tad Macfarlan |Samuel Boden

On 17 April 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy designed to improve collaboration between its civil and criminal enforcement offices, with the goal of promoting "optimal enforcement." The Policy was issued by EPA's Assistant Administrator for the Office Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA), David M.

May 7, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Samuel Boden |Varu Chilakamarri |Barry M. Hartman

On 17 April 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy designed to improve collaboration between its civil and criminal enforcement offices, with the goal of promoting “optimal enforcement.” The Policy was issued by EPA’s Assistant Administrator for the Office Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA), David M.

May 6, 2024 | natlawreview.com | Barry M. Hartman

On 17 April 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy designed to improve collaboration between its civil and criminal enforcement offices, with the goal of promoting “optimal enforcement.” The Policy was issued by EPA’s Assistant Administrator for the Office Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA), David M.

May 6, 2024 | lexology.com | Varu Chilakamarri |Barry M. Hartman |Theodore Kornobis |Tad Macfarlan |Samuel Boden

On 17 April 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a new Strategic Civil-Criminal Enforcement Policy designed to improve collaboration between its civil and criminal enforcement offices, with the goal of promoting “optimal enforcement.” The Policy was issued by EPA’s Assistant Administrator for the Office Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA), David M.

Jun 7, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Maureen O'Dea Brill |Barry M. Hartman |Tad Macfarlan

It is rare for the U.S. Supreme Court to construe a statutory phrase on multiple occasions. And yet now, for purposes of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act), it has rendered no less than four interpretations of the phrase “waters of the United States” – a phrase that is meant to define the scope of federal authority to regulate water pollution. On 25 May the Supreme Court issued a landmark CWA decision in Sackett v. EPA.