Benjamin Weingarten
Senior Contributor at The Federalist
Contributor at RealClear Investigations
Columnist at New York Post
Senior Contributor @FDRLST | Contributor @RCInvestigates | Columns @nypost et al. | Author: https://t.co/eLDO5sejhS | News: https://t.co/veDcxnPX4p
Articles
-
2 weeks ago |
etxview.com | Benjamin Weingarten
As the Trump administration faces substantial pushback in the courts, including an unprecedented wave of nationwide injunctions halting its policies, some are claiming that his opponents are tilting the scales of justice by selectively bringing their lawsuits before sympathetic courts in a practice called “forum shopping.” They note that three-quarters of the lower court justices who have blocked Trump policies were appointed by Democrats.
-
2 weeks ago |
wfmz.com | Benjamin Weingarten
As the Trump administration faces substantial pushback in the courts, including an unprecedented wave of nationwide injunctions halting its policies, some are claiming that his opponents are tilting the scales of justice by selectively bringing their lawsuits before sympathetic courts in a practice called “forum shopping.” They note that three-quarters of the lower court justices who have blocked Trump policies were appointed by Democrats.
-
2 weeks ago |
theohiopressnetwork.com | Benjamin Weingarten
As the Trump administration faces substantial pushback in the courts, including an unprecedented wave of nationwide injunctions halting its policies, some are claiming that his opponents are tilting the scales of justice by selectively bringing their lawsuits before sympathetic courts in a practice called “forum shopping.” They note that three-quarters of the lower court justices who have blocked Trump policies were appointed by Democrats.
-
1 month ago |
lucianne.com | Benjamin Weingarten
Original ArticlePosted By: Moritz55, 5/16/2025 1:40:34 PMWill the Supreme Court stop radicals in robes from subverting the president and imperiling the separation of powers via rule by universal injunction? Or will it continue allowing any one of 680 district court judges to nullify the votes of tens of millions of Americans by hamstringing the commander in chief with rulings infringing upon his powers to pursue policy and pick personnel?
-
1 month ago |
nypost.com | Benjamin Weingarten
Will the Supreme Court stop radicals in robes from subverting the president and imperiling the separation of powers via rule by universal injunction? Or will it continue allowing any one of 680 district court judges to nullify the votes of tens of millions of Americans by hamstringing the commander in chief with rulings infringing upon his powers to pursue policy and pick personnel?
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 63K
- Tweets
- 68K
- DMs Open
- No
"[T]he United States has repeatedly used aid as an inducement to extract Israeli concessions on core security issues." The sooner Israel can achieve independence in its military production capabilities, the better it will be for the U.S. and Israel https://t.co/U7ci3lzKDG
Midnight Hammer Quicklook, by @cdrsalamander https://t.co/xflx35RuRv
Oh
China warns Iran after Iranians threaten to close Strait of Hormuz "The Persian Gulf and its surrounding waters are important trade routes for global commerce and must remain protected from instability."
