César Terrer

Oct 23, 2024 | nature.com | Shouzhang Peng |César Terrer |Benjamin Smith |Philippe Ciais |Joshua Fisher |Lei Deng

AbstractEcosystem restoration is a critical nature-based solution to mitigate climate change. However, the carbon sequestration potential of restoration, defined as the maximum achievable carbon storage, has likely been overestimated because previous studies have not adequately accounted for the competition between ecosystem water demands for maximizing carbon sequestration and human water needs.

Aug 23, 2024 | nature.com | Guiyao Zhou |Nico Eisenhauer |César Terrer |David Eldridge |Emilio Guirado |Miguel Berdugo | +1 more

AbstractTerrestrial ecosystems are subjected to multiple global changes simultaneously. Yet, how an increasing number of global changes impact the resistance of ecosystems to global change remains virtually unknown. Here we present a global synthesis including 14,000 observations from seven ecosystem services (functions and biodiversity), as well as data from a 15-year field experiment.

Jun 27, 2024 | nature.com | Shuai Ren |César Terrer |Juan Li |Shanshan Yang

Correction to: Nature Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01957-9, published online 15 March 2024In the version of the article initially published, in equation (2), “+ 0.31” originally read “+ 0.25”. In the “Meta-analysis” section of the Methods, “((elnR−1) × 100)” originally read “(e(lnR−1) × 100)”. These corrections have been made to the HTML and PDF versions of the article. About this articleRen, S., Terrer, C., Li, J. et al.

May 15, 2024 | onlinelibrary.wiley.com | Yong Zhang |Xiaoli Cheng |César Terrer |Woo-Jung Choi

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supporting Information Filename Description gcb17309-sup-0001-Supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 6.4 MB Figure S1. Figure S2. Figure S3. Figure S4. Figure S5. Figure S6. Figure S7. Figure S8. Figure S9. Figure S10. Figure S11. Figure S12. Table S1. Table S2. Table S3. gcb17309-sup-0002-DataS1.zipZip archive, 2.6 MB Data S1. Data S2. Data S3. Data S4.

Mar 15, 2024 | nature.com | Shuai Ren |César Terrer |Juan Li |Shanshan Yang

AbstractGrazing has been associated with contrasting effects on soil carbon stocks at local scales, but accurate global assessments of its net impact are lacking. Here we conducted a meta-analysis of 1,473 soil carbon observations from grazing studies to quantify global changes in soil carbon stocks due to grazing practices. Our analysis shows that grazing has reduced soil carbon stocks at 1-m depth by 46 ± 13 PgC over the past 60 years.