-
Jun 7, 2024 | 
inria.hal.science | Andrea Jiménez |Christopher Foster
Negotiating Inclusion and Digital Entrepreneurship in a Zambian Innovation Hub: A Post-colonial Perspective Mots clés Innovation Inclusion Post-colonial Digital entrepreneurship Global South Fichier sous embargo 0 ― 6 ― 25 Année Mois Jours Avant la publication mercredi 1 janvier 2025
-
May 30, 2024 | 
jdsupra.com | Christopher Foster |Alva C. Mather |Alexander L. Randolph
As reported throughout the trade press, alcohol beverage companies are facing escalating pressure from unions and the National Labor Relations Board (or NLRB, the federal agency that enforces labor laws against both unionized and non-unionized companies). As recently as last month, an NLRB administrative law judge ordered Woodford Reserve Distillery to recognize and bargain with a union even though that union lost the election (45 employees voted against the union and only 14 in favor).
-
May 8, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Julian André |Rosa Barcelo |Caitlyn Campbell |Edward Diskant |James Durkin |Jonathan Ende | +16 more
To view this article you need a PDF viewer such as Adobe Reader. If you can't read this PDF, you can view its text here. Go back to the PDF.
-
Feb 12, 2024 | 
employeebenefitsblog.com | Christopher Foster
By and on February 12, 2024 Posted In Employment, Labor A recent National Labor Relations Board decision will likely expose a broader range of workplace rules to regulator enforcement. According to this HR Dive article, introducing even ordinary workplace rules during unionization could draw new scrutiny.
-
Jan 24, 2024 | 
employeebenefitsblog.com | Christopher Foster |Todd Solomon
Managing Your Workforce During Market Volatility: Labor and Union Issues Corporate transactions and investments involving union issues require concrete analysis of risk, contingencies and game plans.
-
Dec 19, 2023 | 
natlawreview.com | Christopher Foster
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has changed its joint-employer rule, making it easier for entities doing business with each other to be deemed joint employers, and so jointly subject to union organizing campaigns, collective bargaining, and related operational restraints, strikes, and unfair labor practice investigations and litigation.
-
Dec 19, 2023 | 
employeebenefitsblog.com | Christopher Foster |Sandra M. DiVarco |Alexander L. Randolph
The National Labor Relations Board has changed its joint-employer rule, making it easier for entities doing business with each other to be deemed joint employers. The new rule goes further than any earlier joint-employer standard in two ways: (1) by making clear that indirect (or even unexercised) control is sufficient to prove joint-employer status, and (2) by dropping the requirement that there be enough control to permit meaningful collective bargaining.
-
Sep 27, 2023 | 
employeebenefitsblog.com | David Beach |Christopher Foster
NLRB Undercuts Work Rules and Policies for Unionized and Nonunionized Employers The National Labor Relations Board recently issued a decision that undercuts union and nonunion employers’ ability to enforce longstanding work policies. In general, this decision will lead to increased unfair labor practice charges, investigations and litigation. Read more here.
-
Sep 15, 2023 | 
natlawreview.com | Christopher Foster
Academic focus on a pending Sixth Circuit Appealby: Healthcare Group Squire Patton Boggs Fifth Circuit Overturns Decades-Old Precedent, Expands Scope of... by: Jennifer Faroldi Kogosand Jacob J. Pritt Vietnam Seeks Market Economy Status for Antidumpingby: International Trade Practice at Squire Patton Boggs The Countdown Starts: Compliance Dates Set for Private Fund Adviser... by: Robert H. Suttonand Robert E Plaze Weekly IRS Roundup September 4 – September 8, 2023by: Evan Walters Bye-bye BSBY?
-
Sep 12, 2023 | 
jdsupra.com | David Beach |P. Kevin Connelly |Christopher Foster
In its recent Cemex Construction decision, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) abandoned two fundamental rules enshrined in Supreme Court case law. Both of those Supreme Court decisions prioritized secret ballot elections to determine if employees desired union representation or not and if employers had a duty to bargain with unions. In Linden Lumber v.
