Christopher S. Finnerty

Sep 25, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Jack Brodsky |Kelly Bungard |Christopher S. Finnerty

Price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) involves charging different prices to competing buyers for the same product. This was the key issue recently before the Ninth Circuit in U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distrib. v. Inno. Ventures, LLC1. In its 20 July 2023 opinion, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s determination that U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distribution, Inc.

Sep 20, 2023 | natlawreview.com | Christopher S. Finnerty

Wednesday, September 20, 2023 Price discrimination under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) involves charging different prices to competing buyers for the same product. This was the key issue recently before the Ninth Circuit in U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distrib. v. Inno. Ventures, LLC1. In its 20 July 2023 opinion, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s determination that U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distribution, Inc.

Jul 31, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Francesco Carloni |Christopher S. Finnerty |Michal Kocon

In late June 2023, Europe’s highest court confirmed in a hotly anticipated judgment involving leading Portuguese beer and beverage producer Super Bock Bebidas that resale price maintenance (RPM)—namely the vertical fixing of customers’ resale prices—does not automatically constitute a “by object” restriction of competition under EU antitrust law.

Jul 28, 2023 | mondaq.com | Michal Kocon |Jennifer Marsh |Christopher S. Finnerty |Annette Mutschler-Siebert

In late June 2023, Europe's highest court confirmed in a hotly anticipated judgment involving leading Portuguese beer and beverage producer Super Bock Bebidas that resale price maintenance (RPM)—namely the vertical fixing of customers' resale prices—does not automatically constitute a "by object" restriction of competition under EU antitrust law.

Jul 26, 2023 | lexology.com | Michal Kocon |Jennifer Marsh |Christopher S. Finnerty |Annette Mutschler-Siebert |M. Jur |Nikolaos Peristerakis | +1 more

In late June 2023, Europe’s highest court confirmed in a hotly anticipated judgment involving leading Portuguese beer and beverage producer Super Bock Bebidas that resale price maintenance (RPM)—namely the vertical fixing of customers’ resale prices—does not automatically constitute a “by object” restriction of competition under EU antitrust law.