
Cristian Farias
Writer and Editor at Freelance
Legal Affairs Contributor at Vanity Fair
Legal journalist and beachgoer. I’ve written about law, justice, and the politics shaping them in lots of places. Edit: @_inquest_. Hablo y pienso en español.
Articles
-
1 week ago |
vanityfair.com | Cristian Farias
Nearly one month has gone by since Kilmar Armando Ábrego García, a Maryland husband and father whom an immigration judge had expressly allowed to remain in the United States years ago, was taken from his family, put on a plane, and sent to a so-called “terrorism confinement center” in El Salvador. The Trump administration did this in our names by mistake and without legal authority, acknowledging in a court of law that an “administrative error” had caused this unlawful disappearance.
-
2 weeks ago |
newyorker.com | Cristian Farias
The New Civil Liberties Alliance, or N.C.L.A., was founded during the early days of the first Trump Administration by a group of conservative-leaning legal advocates, to “tame the unlawful power of state and federal agencies.” Many of their cases have targeted the same kind of administrative power that President Trump himself is determined to stamp out—including his all-out assault on independent watchdogs and agencies.
-
3 weeks ago |
nymag.com | Cristian Farias
The Saturday that Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge of the federal district court in Washington, D.C., was assigned the case challenging Donald Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act, he was not dressed for the occasion. The case had been filed alongside an urgent motion to prevent the deportation of five people their lawyers feared would soon be disappeared to El Salvador.
-
3 weeks ago |
rsn.org | Cristian Farias
The Chief Justice’s rebuke of Donald Trump over his calls to impeach judges obscures Roberts’s own role in fostering the destruction in Washington.
-
4 weeks ago |
newyorker.com | Cristian Farias
In the first landmark Supreme Court decision of the Trump years, back in 2018, Chief Justice John Roberts established how a President hostile toward a group of noncitizens may bar them under existing immigration laws, so long as the President’s publicly stated reasons for doing so are “facially neutral.” If that test is met, the courts must bow to the President’s action, no matter the evidence of any prior hostility toward the group in question.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 21K
- Tweets
- 75K
- DMs Open
- Yes

RT @MerriamWebster: pole = 💈 poll = 🗳️

RT @VanityFair: The Supreme Court that empowered Donald Trump won’t save democracy—only voters can. https://t.co/cRAxA6b95w

RT @mlcalderone: “The Supreme Court That Empowered Donald Trump Won’t Save Democracy—Only Voters Can” @cristianafarias on the 2024 legal f…