Daniel Siracusa

1 month ago | mondaq.com | Daniel Siracusa |Michael Solomon

In Cascade Aerospace Inc v Viking Air Limited, 2025BCCA 2 ("Viking Air"), theBritish Columbia Court of Appeal (the "Court ofAppeal") upheld the chambers judge's grant of a"replevin order" requiring that the defendant, CascadeAerospace Inc. ("Cascade"), return anairplane to the plaintiff, Viking Air Limited("Viking") pending trial. A replevinorder requires the temporary return of property to a party claimingto own it pending the outcome of a trial about the property.