Danielle Pollock

Oct 17, 2024 | jclinepi.com | Danielle Pollock |Catrin Evans |Romy Menghao Jia |Lyndsay Alexander |Dawid Pieper |Micah Peters | +5 more

1Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 2The Nottingham Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK 3JBI, School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 4School of Health Science & The Scottish Centre for Evidence-based, Multi-professional Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence,...

Feb 27, 2024 | jclinepi.com | Danielle Pollock |La Trobe |Christina Godfrey |Robert Gordon

This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here. AbstractSystematic reviews have long been seen as critical in the development of trustworthy guidelines. However, as newer synthesis methodologies such as scoping reviews become more common, there is a need to discuss the potential role of these methodologies within guideline development. This article aims to summarize and provide examples of the role of scoping reviews in guideline development.