David Greene

Featured in: Favicon

washingtonpost.com Favicon

bandcamp.com Favicon

kamufm.org Favicon

commondreams.org Favicon

techdirt.com Favicon

cpr.org + 88 more

Articles

EFF to Federal Trial Court: Section 230’s Little-Known Third Immunity for User-Empowerment Tools Covers Unfollow Everything 2.0

Sep 24, 2024 | eff.org | Sophia Cope |David Greene |Aaron Mackey

EFF along with the ACLU of Northern California and the Center for Democracy & Technology filed an amicus brief in a federal trial court in California in support of a college professor who fears being sued by Meta for developing a tool that allows Facebook users to easily clear out their News Feed.
In These Five Social Media Speech Cases, Supreme Court Set Foundational Rules for the Future

Aug 14, 2024 | eff.org | David Greene

The U.S. Supreme Court addressed government’s various roles with respect to speech on social media in five cases reviewed in its recently completed term.
Platforms Have First Amendment Right to Curate Speech, As We’ve Long Argued, Supreme Court Said Without Addressing Whether That Applies to Other Services Like Messaging

Jul 14, 2024 | eff.org | David Greene

Social media platforms, at least in their most common form, have a First Amendment right to curate the third-party speech they select for and recommend to their users, and the government’s ability to manipulate those processes is extremely limited, the U.S. Supreme Court stated in its landmark decision in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton, which were decided together.
EFF's Statement on the Netchoice Decisions

Jul 1, 2024 | eff.org | David Greene

The Supreme Court correctly found that social media platforms, like newspapers, bookstores, and art galleries before them, have First Amendment rights to curate and edit the speech of others they deliver to their users, and the government has a very limited role in dictating what social media platforms must and must not publish.
EFF Statement on Assange Plea Deal

Jun 25, 2024 | eff.org | David Greene

No single country should be able to restrict speech across the entire internet. That's why EFF celebrates the news that Australia's eSafety Commissioner is dropping its legal effort to have content on X taken down across the globe. This development comes just days after EFF and FIRE were granted official...
Childish Gambino print

May 8, 2024 | davidziggygreene.bigcartel.com | David Greene
Supreme Court Does Not Go Far Enough In Determining When Government Officials Are Barred From Censoring Critics On Social Media

Apr 3, 2024 | techdirt.com | Sophia Cope |David Greene

After several years of litigation across the federal appellate courts, the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion has finally crafted a test that lower courts can use to determine whether a government official engaged in “state action” such that censoring individuals on the official’s social media page—even if also used for personal purposes—would violate the First Amendment. The case, Lindke v.
Aviation Photo #7535101: Embraer EMB-120RT Brasilia - Albatros Airlines

Apr 3, 2024 | airliners.net | Roger Cannegieter |David Greene |Wolfgang Kaiser

Distinct Views: 9 Photo Added: April 22, 2024 Photo Copyright © Roger Cannegieter - Curacao Aviation Photography. All rights reserved. Airliners.net is not affiliated with any entity mentioned or pictured herein. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Five Questions To Ask Before Backing The TikTok Ban

Mar 19, 2024 | techdirt.com | Hudson Hongo |David Greene

With strong bipartisan support, the U.S. House voted 352 to 65 to pass HR 7521 last week, a bill that would ban TikTok nationwide if its Chinese owner doesn’t sell the popular video app. The TikTok bill’s future in the U.S. Senate isn’t yet clear, but President Joe Biden has said he would sign it into law if it reaches his desk. The speed at which lawmakers have moved to advance a bill with such a significant impact on speech is alarming.
Lawmakers: Ban TikTok to Stop Election Misinformation! Same Lawmakers: Restrict How Government Addresses Election Misinformation!

Mar 15, 2024 | eff.org | David Greene

In a case being heard Monday at the Supreme Court, 45 Washington lawmakers have argued that government communications with social media sites about possible election interference misinformation are illegal. Agencies can't even pass on information about websites state election officials have identified as disinformation, even if they don't request that any action be taken, they assert.

Contact details

Emails

[email protected]

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →