Debayan Roy
Special Correspondent at Bar & Bench
Special Correspondent @barandbench (Supreme Court of India) Previously with ThePrint & CNN News18. (Former IP Lawyer) For leads: [email protected]
Articles
-
2 weeks ago |
barandbench.com | Debayan Roy
The Supreme Court has restored a criminal case against Moon June Seok, the former Chief Financial Officer of Daechang Seat Automotive, a manufacturer of car seat frames. Seok was one of the accused in a case of financial fraud committed against Daechang. However, the proceedings against him were quashed by the Karnataka High Court last year.
-
2 weeks ago |
barandbench.com | Debayan Roy
The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed that all petitions and cases concerning the new building for Bombay High Court and the land on which the same is proposed to be built, will be heard by the High Court and not any other court. A Bench of Justices BR Gavai and Augustine George Masih also directed that all such matters be heard by the same bench of the High Court so that the disputes can be decided without delay.
-
2 weeks ago |
barandbench.com | Debayan Roy
The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside a Calcutta High Court direction for a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into a decision taken by the West Bengal State Cabinet to create supernumerary posts in State-run and government aided schools.
-
2 weeks ago |
barandbench.com | Debayan Roy
Supreme Court judge Justice Bela M Trivedi on Wednesday remarked that it was painful for her to take steps against lawyers at the fag end of her career for their misconduct [N Easwaranathan v. State]. The Bench of Justices Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma was hearing a criminal case in which it had previously censured Advocate-on-record P Soma Sundaram for alleged suppression of facts in a case. "It is painful for me that at the fag end of my career I have to take such steps.
-
2 weeks ago |
barandbench.com | Debayan Roy
Senior Counsel Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu, chose to withdraw the plea after the Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar said that the Madras High Court can deal with the issues raised in the petition relating to search and seizure and seizure of electronic gadgets. "As far as search and seizure is concerned, the 1956 judgment settles it. Let it be decided. Let it be decided there (in Madras High Court). You can come here later.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 7K
- Tweets
- 17K
- DMs Open
- Yes
Hello Cr Park bangalis. How are you all?
Please watch saffron brigade BJP goons threaten fish-eating Bengalis of Chittaranjan Park, Delhi. Never in 60 years has this happened, residents say. https://t.co/jt5NCQHo9i
RT @barandbench: Supreme Court refers to the recent case of New York court where the judges encountered an AI person arguing before them vi…
RT @barandbench: [BREAKING] Congress MP Mohammad Jawed moves Supreme Court against Waqf Amendment Act report by @DebayonRoy https://t.co…