
Articles
-
2 weeks ago |
jdsupra.com | Edward Lanquist |Nicole Berkowitz Riccio
The Federal Circuit's recent en banc decision in EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC has already been touted as a landmark decision on expert damages testimony in patent cases. In EcoFactor, the Federal Circuit weighed in on the gatekeeping function of trial courts and found that the district court abused its discretion in failing to exclude the unreliable testimony of EcoFactor's damages expert.
-
Mar 3, 2025 |
jdsupra.com | Adam Baldridge |Edward Lanquist
The Supreme Court recently issued its opinion in Dewberry Group, Inc., FKA Dewberry Capital Corp. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. (23-900, Feb. 26, 2025), and addressed the issue of awarding profits in a trademark infringement case under the Lanham Act, specifically, whether the profits of the defendant's affiliated companies can be included in the award. Dewberry Engineers Inc. sued Dewberry Group, a competitor in the real estate development industry, for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act.
-
Oct 3, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Edward Lanquist |Dominic Rota
We all know that a patent application can be a significant asset to a company and its valuation. However, too many companies mistakenly believe that all software is not patentable. As a result, they are failing to file patent applications that can provide value now, as well as in the future. This article will discuss the benefits of filing patent applications for even marginally patentable software-based inventions.
-
Sep 19, 2024 |
hypepotamus.com | Edward Lanquist |Dominic Rota
Editor’s Note: This contributor article is from Edward D. Lanquist and Dominic Rota at the law firm Baker Donelson, who shared eight key steps founders need to think about during their IP journey. A startup’s most significant asset is often its intellectual property (IP). Inventions, branding, software, and external-facing content can impact the overall value of the startup enterprise and its appeal to investors. This article provides a detailed list of how startups can best protect their IP.
-
Jun 19, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Edward Lanquist
The Second Circuit issued a ruling on May 28, 2024, in a trade dress case, affirming the district court's decision that Redemption Whiskey diluted the trademark and trade dress rights of Bulleit Whiskey since Redemption's bottle resembled the design of the Bulleit's distinct canteen-shaped whiskey bottles. This case demonstrates that a finding of "fame" in dilution cases does not require a company to be a household brand.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →