Elaine Ruth Fletcher
Editor-in-Chief at Health Policy Watch
Editor-in-chief, Health Policy Watch
Articles
-
1 week ago |
healthpolicy-watch.news | Elaine Ruth Fletcher
The World Health Organization decried Thursday’s direct hit by Iran on one of Israel’s largest hospitals, Soroka Medical Center, which put the 1200-bed facility serving most of the country’s southern region largely out of operation. In an X post, WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also deplored the deaths of three Iranian Red Crescent Society health workers three days ago, following an Israeli airstrike on Tehran three days ago.
-
3 weeks ago |
healthpolicy-watch.news | Elaine Ruth Fletcher
Most countries’ climate action plans refer to the health benefits of adaptation and mitigation strategies, such as reduced air pollution, but few actually track them. And as World Environment Day is observed Thursday, global climate commitments remain extraordinarily weak. Only 21 countries out of the 195 parties to the UN Paris Agreement have submitted updated national climate action plans (Nationally Determined Commitments) through the year 2035 – nearly four months after the plans were due.
-
1 month ago |
healthpolicy-watch.news | Elaine Ruth Fletcher
A new WHO Climate and Health Action plan was approved by a key World Health Assembly Committee Tuesday evening – after hours of high-stakes, high drama parliamentary maneuvers by a cluster of oil-rich WHO member states to shelve the plan failed. WHO Member states accepted the original plan by a vote of 109-0, with 19 absentions. Hours earlier, the WHA rejected a Saudi-led initiative to delay approval of the plan for another year by a vote of 86-23 with 11 abstentions.
-
1 month ago |
healthpolicy-watch.news | Elaine Ruth Fletcher
Vital medical aid from World Health Organization supply trucks has yet to reach the beseiged Gaza enclave since the doors of an 80-day blockade inched open a week ago, said Hanan Balkhy, WHO’s director for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, at a UN-Geneva press briefing on Monday.
-
1 month ago |
healthpolicy-watch.news | Elaine Ruth Fletcher
For the first time since the 1990s, the World Health Organization has been asked by member states to update its assessment on the health impacts of nuclear war, although not without significant resistance, led by Russia and North Korea, but also including many other major nuclear states. The resolution calling for an updated assessment of the “effects of nuclear war on public health” was approved by a margin of 84-14 votes with 28 abstentions.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 229
- Tweets
- 147
- DMs Open
- No
RT @wto: 🗨️Organisations and Members that have cooperated on the #Aid4Trade initiative have made a huge difference in peoples' lives, said…
RT @grescoe: "Our present headache: a superhighway system jammed with people fleeing not from disaster but from the very city that is suppo…
RT @ErikSolheim: Truly innovative! 👏👏👏 Traditional wind turbines are sometimes noisy and disturbiing landscapes. Welcome to the wind tree!…