Eric Enson

Sep 5, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Eric Enson |John Majoras |Julia McEvoy

Seeking divestitures in a criminal case sets precedent for DOJ and is consistent with the Administration's mantra of "every tool in the kit" approach to aggressive antitrust enforcement. The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division ("DOJ") recently resolved a criminal case with Teva Pharmaceuticals and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals via deferred prosecution agreements ("DPAs"), which include a novel remedy for a criminal antitrust case: divestiture.

Sep 4, 2023 | mondaq.com | John Majoras |Eric Enson |Julia McEvoy

Seeking divestitures in a criminal case sets precedent for DOJ and is consistent with the Administration's mantra of "every tool in the kit" approach to aggressive antitrust enforcement. The U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division ("DOJ") recently resolved a criminal case with Teva Pharmaceuticals and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals via deferred prosecution agreements ("DPAs"), which include a novel remedy for a criminal antitrust case: divestiture.

May 3, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Eric Enson |Rasha Gerges Shields |Peter Julian

In another setback for DOJ's antitrust enforcement agenda in labor markets, a Connecticut federal court held in U.S. v. Patel that no reasonable juror could find the defendants guilty of a no-poach market allocation scheme beyond a reasonable doubt, and prevented the case from going to the jury. This marks the fourth consecutive case in which DOJ failed to secure criminal convictions against companies and executives accused of labor-side antitrust violations, wage fixing, or no-poach agreements.

May 2, 2023 | lexology.com | Eric Enson |Peter Julian |Lin W. Kahn |David Kiernan |John Majoras |Julia McEvoy

A Connecticut district court acquitted six defendants of criminal antitrust violations arising out of alleged employee no-poach agreements, marking the first dismissal of a U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division's ("DOJ") criminal antitrust charges as a matter of law since the early 1990s. May 2023 AlertIn another setback for DOJ's antitrust enforcement agenda in labor markets, a Connecticut federal court held in U.S. v.

Apr 27, 2023 | concurrences.com | Eric Enson |Peter Julian |Lin W. Kahn |David Kiernan

Lin Kahn is a partner with Jones Day based in the firm’s San Francisco office. has more than a decade of experience in private practice and public service focusing on antitrust litigation and government investigations. Lin rejoined Jones Day after five years at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), where she served as lead litigation and trial counsel in the agency’s successful challenge to a price-fixing conspiracy in the dental industry.