Frida Garza's profile photo

Frida Garza

New York

Staff Writer at Grist

food & ag staff writer @grist, priors @guardianUS

Featured in: Favicon theguardian.com Favicon msn.com Favicon yahoo.com (+2) Favicon gizmodo.com Favicon vice.com Favicon qz.com Favicon bizjournals.com Favicon weforum.org Favicon elle.com Favicon eldiario.es

Articles

  • 4 days ago | grist.org | Frida Garza

    It is virtually impossible for the world to achieve the Paris Agreement’s climate targets without producing and consuming dramatically less meat. But demand for plant-based alternatives, like the imitation burgers sold by Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat, has steadily declined in recent years — all while global meat consumption continues to grow. The problem with plant-based alternatives, for the moment, is that most consumers just don’t seem interested in buying them instead of conventional meat.

  • 4 days ago | ecotopical.com | Frida Garza

    Welcome to EcoTopical Your daily eco-friendly green news aggregator. Leaf through planet Earths environmental headlines in one convenient place. Read, share and discover the latest on ecology, science and green living from the web's most popular sites.

  • 5 days ago | sentientmedia.org | Frida Garza

    Two years ago this week, the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. the Environmental Protection Agency significantly limited the agency’s ability to use the 1972 Clean Water Act to safeguard the nation’s wetlands from pollution and destruction. The decision determined that wetlands — waterlogged habitats that help filter water and sequester carbon — must be indistinguishable from larger bodies of water to be eligible for protection under the law.

  • 1 week ago | investigatemidwest.org | Juanpablo Ramirez-Franco |Frida Garza

    This story was originally published by Grist. Two years ago this week, the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. the Environmental Protection Agency significantly limited the agency’s ability to use the 1972 Clean Water Act to safeguard the nation’s wetlands from pollution and destruction. The decision determined that wetlands — waterlogged habitats that help filter water and sequester carbon — must be indistinguishable from larger bodies of water to be eligible for protection under the law.

  • 1 week ago | yahoo.com | Juanpablo Ramirez-Franco |Frida Garza

    Two years ago this week, the Supreme Court’s decision in Sackett v. the Environmental Protection Agency significantly limited the agency’s ability to use the 1972 Clean Water Act to safeguard the nation’s wetlands from pollution and destruction. The decision determined that wetlands — waterlogged habitats that help filter water and sequester carbon — must be indistinguishable from larger bodies of water to be eligible for protection under the law.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →

X (formerly Twitter)

Followers
3K
Tweets
376
DMs Open
Yes
frida garza
frida garza @fffffrida
12 Mar 25

spending more time on the other app these days 🤠 follow me if the spirit moves you https://t.co/542xH2EF1u

frida garza
frida garza @fffffrida
30 Jan 25

RT @talmonsmith: everybody is obsessed with productivity lately and rightly so. it's the black matter & holy grail of econ but somewhere a…

frida garza
frida garza @fffffrida
24 Nov 24

RT @dharnanoor: I wrote about the calls for justice in Gaza here at COP29 in Baku As Ahmed Abu Thaher of Palestine’s Environment Quality A…