Haojie Li

Oct 21, 2024 | mdpi.com | Li Kong |Kun Yang |Haojie Li |Xie Wu

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.

Sep 18, 2024 | mdpi.com | Ye Zhu |Haojie Li |Xie Wu |Nan Chen

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.

Jun 7, 2024 | mdpi.com | Haojie Li |Jianyu Wang |Lixiao Zeng |Weilai Yao

1. IntroductionThe space gravitational wave [1,2] antenna program Taiji consists of three spacecrafts flying in a heliocentric [3], with separations of L=3×109 m [4]. Each spacecraft (SC) contains two proof masses that are shielded from external disturbances. Bidirectional laser links are maintained between all SC in the constellation for exchanging laser beams to interferometrically measure the pathlength variations at the picometer level caused by gravitational waves [5,6].

Feb 10, 2024 | onlinelibrary.wiley.com | Hanlin L Wang |Siqi Liu |Haojie Li

Supporting Information Filename Description adma202313098-sup-0001-SuppMat.pdf3.7 MB Supporting Information adma202313098-sup-0002-SuppMat.zip18.4 KB Supporting Information

Sep 21, 2023 | mdpi.com | Yuxin Yang |Qiang Yin |Changsheng Li |Haojie Li

4.2. Comparison and AnalysisThe existing methods for solving load position differ in two aspects: the input current model and the equivalent model of the A&R. In this section, the solving method used in the previous literature is adopted with the same physical parameters as in the previous section. The calculation errors of these methods are compared, and the reasons for the differences are briefly analyzed.