Harish V. Nair

"People are losing lives & there is no policy in place despite our orders":SC SC summons Road Transport Ministry Secy for not framing a scheme for cashless treatment for road accident victims during golden hour despite a clear order in Jan this year Also threatens Contempt Action

Mirror Now @MirrorNow

#BreakingNews: #SupremeCourt pulls up govt on road accident cases In Focus: Cashless treatment for victims People losing lives due to no treatment, why no cashless treatment in golden hour? Action only after we summon top govt officials: SC @aayeshavarma | @harishvnair1 https://t.co/05yDBO1xJW

"JUDICIARY USED FOR POLITICAL ENDS": Attempt to settle political scores by using judicial system: Senthil Balaji to SC on plea to cancel his bail for “exerting pressure, influencing witnesses” Complainant against Balaji is Vidhya Kumar, one of the victims of cash-for-jobs scam. https://t.co/00EyQAzZeT

WAQF: 1st Intervention plea by a Hindu petitioner filed in SC: "Amendments just & reasonable", Satish Agarwal a member of Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha seeks strict implementation of Waqf Amendment Act. Urges that he be heard when matter is listed for hearing https://t.co/V8GnPnIVZo

WAQF:1st Intervention plea by a Hindu petitioner filed in SC: "Amendments just & reasonable", Satish Agarwal,member of Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha seeks strict implementation of Waqf Amendment Act. Seeks to be heard when matter is listed for hearing. Plea thru Adv Barun Sinha https://t.co/fBNzF7wpDv

RT @MirrorNow: #BreakingNews: Centre files caveat in #SupremeCourt, seeks hearing before orders are passed on pleas challenging Waqf (Amend…

RT @ETNOWlive: Supreme Court slams Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi, sets historic timeline for action on state bills — says holding 10 bills w…

Petitions challenging Waqf Amendments: -CENTRE FILES CAVEAT IN SC -Centre's first reaction to petitions filed in SC challenging Waqf Amendments -Caveat means an application which says that no order [Ex-Parte] shall be passed by SC without hearing/notice toCentre, key respondent.

WAQF CHALLENGE PETITIONS IN SC: AS OF NOW HEARING DATE SHOWN IS APRIL 15. THIS IS HOWEVER TENTATIVE COMPUTER -GENERATED. BATCH OF PETITIONS CAN GET LISTED EARLIER TOO. https://t.co/v3ycyP9hOx

--SC HAD SAID “ENTIRE SELECTION PROCESS TAINTED,VITIATED,THERE IS MANIPULATION,FRAUD --SC HAD SAID “CREDIBILITY OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURE IS DENUDED:SC -- “ENTIRE PROCESS TAINTED BEYOND REPAIR BEYOND PARTIAL REDEMPTION:SC HAD SAID

harish v nair @harishvnair1

-HAVING REGARD TO AFORESAID DISCUSSION, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE HIGH COURT WAS NOT JUSTIFIED IN REFERRING THE ISSUE OF CREATION OF SUPERNUMERARY POST POSTS TO THE CBI PURSUANT TO THE CABINET DECISION.:SC -RECENTLY SC UPHELD HC VERDICT QUASHING 25K TEACHERS APPOINTMENT

-HAVING REGARD TO AFORESAID DISCUSSION, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE HIGH COURT WAS NOT JUSTIFIED IN REFERRING THE ISSUE OF CREATION OF SUPERNUMERARY POST POSTS TO THE CBI PURSUANT TO THE CABINET DECISION.:SC -RECENTLY SC UPHELD HC VERDICT QUASHING 25K TEACHERS APPOINTMENT

harish v nair @harishvnair1

SC DID NOT AGREE WITH HC’S CONCLUSION THAT SUPERNUMERARY POSTS WERE CREATED TO ACCOMMODATE ILLEGAL APPOINTMENTS. -HC ALSO HAD ALLOWED CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION OF SUCH OFFICIALS.

SC DID NOT AGREE WITH HC’S CONCLUSION THAT SUPERNUMERARY POSTS WERE CREATED TO ACCOMMODATE ILLEGAL APPOINTMENTS. -HC ALSO HAD ALLOWED CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION OF SUCH OFFICIALS.

harish v nair @harishvnair1

WB TEACHER’S RECRUITMENT SCAM: -SC RELIEF FOR SEVERAL GOVT OFFICIALS - SC SETS ASIDE HC ORDER DIRECTING CBI PROBE INTO WB CABINET’S DECISION TO CREATE SUPERNUMERARY POSTS IN WEST BENGAL SSC TEACHERS’ APPOINTMENTS -SC BUT SAID CBI PROBE INTO OTHER ASPECTS OF SCAM WILL CONTINUE

WB TEACHER’S RECRUITMENT SCAM: -SC RELIEF FOR SEVERAL GOVT OFFICIALS - SC SETS ASIDE HC ORDER DIRECTING CBI PROBE INTO WB CABINET’S DECISION TO CREATE SUPERNUMERARY POSTS IN WEST BENGAL SSC TEACHERS’ APPOINTMENTS -SC BUT SAID CBI PROBE INTO OTHER ASPECTS OF SCAM WILL CONTINUE

Mirror Now @MirrorNow

#BreakingNews: Bengal teachers recruitment scam case In a minor relief for Mamata Banerjee govt, #SupremeCourt cancels #CBI probe into additional teacher posts in #WestBengal Times Network's @harishvnair1 brings in more info | @RitangshuB https://t.co/3GBFN11unk

RT @MirrorNow: #BreakingNews: Bengal teachers recruitment scam case In a minor relief for Mamata Banerjee govt, #SupremeCourt cancels #CBI…

IF ASSENT IS WITHHELD WITHOUT THE AID AND ADVICE OF COUNCIL OF MINISTERS, BILL TO BE RETURNED WITHIN 3 MONTHS. --IF BILL IS PRESENTED AFTER RECONSIDERATION BY STATE ASSEMBLY, IT HAS TO BE ASSENTED TO WITHIN 1 MONTH

harish v nair @harishvnair1

--IF A RETURNED BILL IS RE-SUBMITTED BY CABINET, HE HAS TO GIVE ASSENT --BILL CAN BE RESERVED FOR THE PRESIDENT ONLY AT THE FIRST INSTANCE. --IN CASE THE GOVERNER WITHHOLDS ASSENT AND RESERVES IT FOR PRESIDENT, HE CAN DO SO MAXIMUM FOR 1 MONTH.

--IF A RETURNED BILL IS RE-SUBMITTED BY CABINET, HE HAS TO GIVE ASSENT --BILL CAN BE RESERVED FOR THE PRESIDENT ONLY AT THE FIRST INSTANCE. --IN CASE THE GOVERNER WITHHOLDS ASSENT AND RESERVES IT FOR PRESIDENT, HE CAN DO SO MAXIMUM FOR 1 MONTH.

harish v nair @harishvnair1

STALIN VS GOVERNOR ROW: SC FRAMES CONSTITUTIONAL CONTOURS OF GOVERNOR’S POWERS VIS-À-VIS BILLS, ALSO FIXES A TIME-FRAME SC SAYS AS PER ART 200, GOV EXPECTED TO TAKE ONE OF 4 COURSES OF ACTION - GRANT ASSENT TO BILLS -WITHHOLD ASSENT TO BILLS OR RESERVE BILLS FOR PRESIDENT. https://t.co/Ab7laKxyOD