Henning Hartwig

1 month ago | ipkitten.blogspot.com | Eleonora Rosati |Henning Hartwig

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg; Chair of the Committee for Design Law of the German Association for Intellectual Property Law) on the comments the GRUR Committee for Design Law submitted on the request made by the Juzgado de lo Mercantil Número 1 de Alicante, Spain, for a preliminary ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the interpretation of provisions of Council...

Jul 4, 2024 | ipkitten.blogspot.com | Eleonora Rosati |Henning Hartwig

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) on a brand-new decision issued by the General Court of the European Union on 3 July 2024 in an interesting design case (Case T-329/22). Here’s what Henning writes:Decoding the General Court in design law – adding matter to the prior art?

Jun 17, 2024 | ipkitten.blogspot.com | Eleonora Rosati |Henning Hartwig

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) on the most recent EUIPO decision relating to invalidity of RCD No 257001-0001 covering the appearance of the famous Crocs design. Here’s what Henning writes:2004, 2007, 2014, 2024 – Four lives for the Crocs design? by Henning HartwigRumour has it that cats have nine lives to spare – for three they play, for three they stray, and for the last three they stay.

Apr 23, 2024 | ipkitten.blogspot.com | Eleonora Rosati |Henning Hartwig

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) on the ‘Puma-Rihanna’ decision issued by the General Court of the European Union on 6 March 2024 (Case T-647/22) [reported and commented by The IPKat here and here].

Oct 30, 2023 | ipkitten.blogspot.com | Eleonora Rosati |Henning Hartwig

The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) on the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal’s recent referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling pursuant to Article 267 TFEU concerning the interpretation of Directive 2001/29/EC in the MIO case (C-580/23) [IPKat here].