Henry Farrell's profile photo

Henry Farrell

Washington, D.C.

Editor-in-Chief at The Monkey Cage

Featured in: Favicon washingtonpost.com Favicon imdb.com Favicon medium.com Favicon msn.com Favicon theguardian.com Favicon nytimes.com Favicon elpais.com Favicon nature.com Favicon ft.com Favicon mit.edu

Articles

  • 1 week ago | programmablemutter.com | Henry Farrell

    [image by Brian Eno, from “77 Million Paintings.” Eno says in this dialogue that he doesn’t mind people using these images for non-commercial purposes]This post’s title is a little cheeky. Brian Eno does not have an explicit theory of democracy that I know of, although he is visibly and emphatically committed to its practice. But Eno’s arguments about the arts tell us important things about how democracy ought work, and what kinds of democratic stability and variety we ought aspire to.

  • 3 weeks ago | indybay.org | Henry Farrell

    The free market is an impossible utopia By Henry Farrell Fred Block (research professor of sociology at University of California at Davis) and Margaret Somers (professor of sociology and history at the University of Michigan) have a new book, "The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique" (Harvard University Press, 2014).

  • 1 month ago | foreignaffairs.com | Michelle Gavin |Henry Farrell |Abraham L. Newman |Laura Gamboa

    Technology companies such as Alphabet, Meta, and OpenAI need to wake up to an unpleasant reality. By getting close to U.S. President Donald Trump, they risk losing access to one of their biggest markets: Europe. Just a decade ago, these companies believed that information technology would limit the power of governments and liberalize the world.

  • 1 month ago | insidestory.org.au | Henry Farrell

    The reactionary right is not a monolith J.D. Vance is attempting to straddle two diametrically different tendencies on the radical right We have a tendency to overestimate how unified our political adversaries are, because of a particular version of what psychologists call the “fundamental attribution error.” When we look at our own side, we all too easily see the incoherence, the petty feuding, bickering and incompetence. When we look at the other, it appears to be possessed by a single...

  • 1 month ago | programmablemutter.com | Henry Farrell

    We have a tendency to over-estimate how unified our political adversaries are, because of a particular version of what psychologists call the “fundamental attribution error.” When we look at our own side, we all too easily see the incoherence, the petty feuding, bickering and incompetence. When we look at the other, it appears to be possessed by a single purpose, marching in lockstep to a coherent evil plan.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →