J. Bradley Karl

3 days ago | tandfonline.com | Dana Telljohann |Patricia Born |J. Bradley Karl

AbstractFollowing natural catastrophes, insurers have many decisions to make regarding their future in a state. In this article, we examine the impact of insurance regulation on the insurer’s decision to continue to provide homeowner insurance products in the state. Using a dataset of form, rate, and rule filing submissions by insurers from 2008 to 2022, we empirically test whether insurers are more likely to engage with the regulator following a natural catastrophe.

Jan 17, 2024 | onlinelibrary.wiley.com | Patricia Born |J. Bradley Karl |Charles Nyce

REFERENCES (1986). The seat belt defense reconsidered: A return to accountability in tort law. New Mexico Law Review, 16, 221–249. , , & (2010). The U.S. experience with no-fault automobile insurance: A retrospective. RAND Institute for Civil Justice. , & (2014). Does the threat of insurer liability for ‘bad faith’ affect insurance settlements. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(1), 1–26. (2014). Database of state tort law reforms (5th ed.). (2002).