Jack Nicastro

RT @robbysoave: I want to associate myself with @mtaibbi here. Many people are currently revealing their own inner ugliness; @ggreenwald is…

Bummed I won't be in NYC to see Nick, KMW (The Boss), Suderman, and Matt Welch yak it up. All my NYC buddies should get tickets ASAP!

Nick Gillespie @nickgillespie

Very excited to announce the @reason Roundtable will be live at @ComedyCellarUSA's Village Underground on July 15! Come see @kmanguward @petersuderman @MattWelch and me! $15 tix will go fast, include entry to afterparty https://t.co/1OU2JN5iDS

$1200 for a three bedroom? How little do I have to make to get one of these? (Talk about perverse incentives) That’s insane!

Christian Britschgi @christianbrits

I don't mean to be a negative Nancy, but if these are NYC's supply siders, we're in trouble. Like half the video is them cheerfully describing all the taxes and mandates they piled onto the developer.

The private sector doing what the government can’t—at least, not economically!

reason @reason

The Brits and French spent a combined $10 billion to develop the Concorde. But the supersonic XB-1 "Baby Boom" is funded by investor and venture capital money—not yours, which is why they have incentive to make it work. Reason’s @jack_g_nicastro shares more. https://t.co/CJZFE6U82G

This is the perfect response. Go Glenn!

Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald

About the videos: https://t.co/TfkSyWowMJ

While the Court of International Trade's decision in V.O.S. Selection is welcome, it's not a win for the separation of powers. IEEPA cases do not belong in the CIT at all because it is not a tariff statute—as Judge Contreras ruled in his decision in Learning Resources:

reason @reason

This week, two courts ruled against Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs, but they did so on importantly different grounds. https://t.co/zD4Xp1j0Co

Republic >>> Autocracy

Justin Amash @justinamash

When everything is an “emergency,” we no longer have a constitutional republic. We have a completely different form of government than the one our Constitution prescribes. It’s no longer a government of limited and divided powers; it’s one of unlimited and concentrated powers.

I’ve returned to NYC after almost a year in the swamp. First change I’ve noticed is LEDs illuminating the doors of subway car…what a great use of taxpayer dollars! 🤦‍♂️

RT @cafreiman: When it’s 2025 and you’re proposing rent control https://t.co/JT8j66cFMa

Ad populum won’t do—America is a constitutional republic, not a direct democracy. Thank God. “The president has an ABSOLUTE RIGHT…” Hold your horses, Hobbes!

Rapid Response 47 @RapidResponse47

American voters gave @POTUS a mandate to address the national security emergency created by historic and persistent trade deficits. The President has an absolute right to preserve our national security, and unelected judges shouldn’t stand in the way. https://t.co/c1FDAJMlvo

RT @EricBoehm87: They really think they can just make stuff up, blame it on leftists, and use that as an excuse to tear down institutions.…

RT @ericadyork: The girls can have their dolls now.

Learned a lot from @neil_chilson @KeeganMcB and @MattInThemittel about Trump’s rescission of Biden’s Framework for AI Diffusion. TL;DR: We need to export chips and AI to friendly countries to generate the revenue required for R&D investment to maintain American dominance.

reason @reason

Trump threw out Biden's AI diffusion framework. Three AI policy experts tell Reason what they think this means for the American economy and national security. https://t.co/8l3v6WlR3R

RT @DanielDiMartino: No more housing will be built in NYC, home prices would fall, and apartment buildings would fall into disrepair. The…

RT @BrianCAlbrecht: https://t.co/IXvF2v9nhZ https://t.co/8MA8KCg72u

RT @billybinion: @StephenM No, Stephen. We are living under a system that checks executive power—because we do not live in a monarchy. It's…

God bless the independent judiciary, the Founders, and Montesquieu 🙏🇺🇸

Phil Magness @PhilWMagness

1. The USCIT was the handpicked court that the Trump DOJ wanted to hear this case. 2. The Trump DOJ spent the last month filing motions to move other tariff challenges to the USCIT for the same reason, including as recently as this week. 3. The 3-0 ruling came from two