Jason C. Gavejian

Jan 16, 2025 | today.westlaw.com | Joseph J. Lazzarotti |Jason C. Gavejian

This month, the New Jersey Attorney General's office (NJAG) added to nationwide efforts to regulate, or at least clarify the application of existing law, in this case the NJ Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. § 10:5-1 et seq. (LAD), to artificial...

Jan 15, 2025 | mondaq.com | Joseph J. Lazzarotti |Jason C. Gavejian

This month, the New Jersey Attorney General's office (NJAG)added to nationwide efforts to regulate, or at least clarify theapplication of existing law, in this case the NJ Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. §10:5-1 et seq. (LAD), to artificial intelligence technologies. Inshort, the NJAG's guidance states:the LAD applies to algorithmic discrimination in the sameway it has long applied to other discriminatory conduct.

Jan 13, 2025 | jdsupra.com | Joseph J. Lazzarotti |Jason C. Gavejian

This month, the New Jersey Attorney General’s office (NJAG) added to nationwide efforts to regulate, or at least clarify the application of existing law, in this case the NJ Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. § 10:5-1 et seq. (LAD), to artificial intelligence technologies. In short, the NJAG’s guidance states:the LAD applies to algorithmic discrimination in the same way it has long applied to other discriminatory conduct.

Jan 8, 2025 | mondaq.com | Jason C. Gavejian |Joseph J. Lazzarotti

As the year comes to a close here are some of the highlightsfrom the Workplace Privacy, Data Management & Security Reportwith our most popular topics and posts from 2024. This year saw a further expansion of state comprehensiveconsumer data privacy laws. These legislative measures aim toenhance the protection of consumer data, ensuring greatertransparency and accountability for businesses that collect andprocess personal information.

Nov 28, 2024 | mondaq.com | Jason C. Gavejian |Joseph J. Lazzarotti

Massachusetts' highest court recently issued an opinion that delves into the complex intersection of privacy law and modern technology. The case centers around whether the collection and transmission of users' web browsing activities to third parties without their consent constitutes a violation of the Massachusetts Wiretap Act. However, the claim is not unique to Massachusetts.