
Jeffrey Warshafsky
Articles
-
Dec 11, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Aaron Francis |Jeffrey Warshafsky
Key Takeaways: Plaintiffs are persistently crafting creative legal theories to target tracking technologies. One new approach is to characterize tracking technologies as “pen registers” or “trap and trace devices” used in violation of CIPA § 638.51. The TikTok Analytics software is at issue in many of these new claims, and a number have survived motions to dismiss and demurrers. Now Trending: The TikTok DoxAnother TikTok trend has gone viral this year. But it’s not what you think.
Some, But Not All: How the North Carolina Planned Community Act affects Pre-1999 Planned Communities
Dec 10, 2024 |
natlawreview.com | Justin Lewis |Dan Jasnow |Jeffrey Warshafsky
In 1999, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the North Carolina Planned Community Act ("Act") as Chapter 47F of the North Carolina General Statutes. The Act was intended to establish certain rights for property owners in planned communities, establish a framework of rules and regulations to govern planned communities, and grant owners' associations the powers necessary to manage them.
-
Dec 10, 2024 |
natlawreview.com | Jeffrey Warshafsky
Key Takeaways:Plaintiffs are persistently crafting creative legal theories to target tracking technologies. One new approach is to characterize tracking technologies as “pen registers” or “trap and trace devices” used in violation of CIPA § 638.51. The TikTok Analytics software is at issue in many of these new claims, and a number have survived motions to dismiss and demurrers. Now Trending: The TikTok DoxAnother TikTok trend has gone viral this year. But it’s not what you think.
-
Nov 20, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Baldassare Vinti |Jeffrey Warshafsky |Naomi Caldwell
The Southern District of New York recently reconsidered its partial denial of Defendant Danone Waters of America's motion to dismiss claims alleging Danone falsely advertised Evian water as "carbon neutral." Reversing his prior ruling, Judge Nelson S. Román concluded that the carbon neutral labeling on Evian water bottle products was not plausibly misleading to reasonable consumers.
-
Nov 18, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Naomi Caldwell |Baldassare Vinti |Jeffrey Warshafsky
The Southern District of New York recently reconsidered its partial denial of Defendant Danone Waters of America’s motion to dismiss claims alleging Danone falsely advertised Evian water as “carbon neutral.” Reversing his prior ruling, Judge Nelson S. Román concluded that the carbon neutral labeling on Evian water bottle products was not plausibly misleading to reasonable consumers.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →