-
4 days ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
On June 20, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions:Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 24-7: This case addresses fuel producers’ Article III standing to challenge the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) approval of California regulations requiring automakers to manufacture more electric vehicles and fewer gasoline-powered vehicles.
-
1 week ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions today:United States v.
-
1 week ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in two cases today:First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, Inc. v. Platkin, No. 24-781: This case concerns the appropriate forum for raising constitutional defenses against a subpoena issued by a state attorney general. In this case, a faith-based non-profit providing counseling for unplanned pregnancies claimed a subpoena issued under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act would chill its First Amendment rights.
-
2 weeks ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions today:Parrish v. United States, No. 24-275: This case addresses the procedural requirements for filing a notice of appeal after the original deadline to appeal has lapsed when the appellant has filed a motion to reopen the time to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c). Petitioner Donte Parrish brought a lawsuit while he was an inmate in a federal prison.
-
2 weeks ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
On June 6, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in four cases:Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton, No. 24-808: This case concerns the applicability of the “reasonable time” requirement for parties to file a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1) seeking relief from a judgment or order. The question presented is: Whether Rule 60(c)(1) imposes any time limit to set aside a void default judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction. Rutherford v.
-
3 weeks ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States issued six decisions today:Ames v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Services, No. 23-1039: This case addresses whether majority-group plaintiffs are held to a heighted evidentiary standard in Title VII employment discrimination cases. Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, sued her employer after she was not hired for a new management position and later demoted.
-
3 weeks ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in four cases today:Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections, No. 24-568: This case involves an Illinois law that required mail-in ballots to be counted as long as they were postmarked or certified by election day, and received within two weeks of election day.
-
4 weeks ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision on May 29, 2025:Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, No. 23-975: This case concerns the scope of federal court review over an agency’s environmental analysis and approval of an infrastructure project. The Seven County Infrastructure Coalition applied to the U. S. Surface Transportation Board (“Board”) for permission to build and operate an 88-mile rail line in Utah to transport crude oil.
-
1 month ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
On Thursday, May 22, the Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions:Kousisis v. United States, No. 23-909: This case addresses the elements of the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
-
1 month ago | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Blodger |Brock Huebner |Jessica Leano
The Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision today:Barnes v. Felix, No. 23-1239: This criminal procedure case concerns the proper scope of analysis for Fourth Amendment excessive force claims. In this case, a driver was pulled over for suspected toll violations. When the driver refused to exit the vehicle and began to drive away, the law enforcement officer jumped onto the doorsill and fatally shot the driver.
