Articles

  • Nov 1, 2024 | lawjournalnewsletters.com | Elkan Abramowitz |Jonathan Sack

    Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30% Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription. Page printed from: https://www.lawjournalnewsletters.com/2024/11/01/the-binding-effect-of-plea-agreements-in-white-collar-crimes/ FeaturesBusiness Crimes BulletinCriminal LawWhite Collar Crime Federal plea agreements sometimes state explicitly that they are limited to that one office and do not bind other U.S. attorney's offices.

  • Sep 5, 2024 | law.com | Elkan Abramowitz |Jonathan Sack

    In June, the Supreme Court held in Snyder v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 1947 (2024), that a federal anti-corruption statute applied only to “bribes,” not “gratuities.” The majority interpreted the statute narrowly on the basis of six considerations: text, statutory history, statutory structure, statutory punishments, federalism, and fair notice.

  • Jul 8, 2024 | law.com | Elkan Abramowitz |Jonathan Sack

    The Supreme Court has taken pains in recent years to mark the boundaries of the federal mail/wire fraud statutes. Of particular importance has been the outer limits of “property” in the context of a deprivation of “money or property.” In Kelly v. United States, 140 S.Ct. 1565, 1573 (2020), the court held that “money or property” fraud does not encompass a misuse of government regulatory powers, or a monetary loss that was “incidental” to a fraud scheme. In Ciminelli v.

  • May 2, 2024 | law.com | Elkan Abramowitz |Jonathan Sack

    For good or ill, perhaps some of both, campaign contributions are essential to politics in the United States. Campaign contributions can reflect genuine support for a candidate’s positions and appreciation for ordinary aid to constituents. They can also become a bribe—that is, part of an illegal quid pro quo for political favors. What should the test be for deciding when a campaign contribution turns into a bribe?

  • Mar 1, 2024 | lawjournalnewsletters.com | Elkan Abramowitz |Jonathan Sack

    RegulationUnited States Supreme CourtWhite Collar CrimeIn this article, we describe the competing interpretations of Section 666 and comment on the implications of a Supreme Court decision in United States v. Snyder, where it will decide whether the law criminalizes “gratuities,” and not simply “bribes,” given to state and local officials. Section 666 of Title 18 has become one of the most important legal tools used in the federal prosecution of state and local corruption.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →