Articles

  • 5 days ago | msnbc.com | Jordan S. Rubin

    Supreme Court Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from their colleagues’ refusal to hear a race discrimination case Monday, in a dispute that also tells a bigger story about the current state of the high court. The rejected petition came from adult entertainer Chanel Nicholson, who performed at clubs in Houston. She brought a lawsuit claiming that the clubs had engaged in race discrimination.

  • 5 days ago | yahoo.com | Jordan S. Rubin

    Supreme Court Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented from their colleagues’ refusal to hear a race discrimination case Monday, in a dispute that also tells a bigger story about the current state of the high court. The rejected petition came from adult entertainer Chanel Nicholson, who performed at clubs in Houston. She brought a lawsuit claiming that the clubs had engaged in race discrimination.

  • 5 days ago | msnbc.com | Jordan S. Rubin

    The Supreme Court refused to take up what would’ve been its next big gun case on Monday, declining to weigh in on Maryland’s ban on certain so-called assault weapons. But three justices objected and a fourth wrote that the court “should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two.”That unusually specific statement came from Justice Brett Kavanaugh. He didn’t go as far as his three Republican-appointed colleagues, who said they wanted to decide the matter now.

  • 1 week ago | msnbc.com | Jordan S. Rubin

    Welcome back, Deadline: Legal Newsletter readers. There’s a new legal process in America. It used to be that a guilty verdict or plea was followed by years of appeals and, perhaps years after that, a prayerful pardon application. This week showcased a new playbook: skirt your tax obligations by millions of dollars to fund a lavish lifestyle, plead guilty and, instead of going to prison or paying restitution, have your mom raise money for the president and then get pardoned.

  • 1 week ago | msnbc.com | Jordan S. Rubin

    “Why are you ignoring the intent of the 14th Amendment, which was to give citizenship to freed slaves and their progeny? Jurisdiction means allegiance to a country, which illegal aliens do not have.”It’s true that the 14th Amendment repudiated the infamous Dred Scott ruling, which had denied citizenship to people of African descent. But it doesn’t follow from that premise to say that U.S.-born babies today aren’t citizens because their parents were here unlawfully.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →

X (formerly Twitter)

Followers
3K
Tweets
4K
DMs Open
Yes
Jordan Rubin
Jordan Rubin @Jordan_S_Rubin
12 Aug 24

RT @lawofruby: Another potential issue, as flagged by my colleague @Jordan_S_Rubin? The Federal Tort Claims Act expressly disallows punitiv…

Jordan Rubin
Jordan Rubin @Jordan_S_Rubin
22 Feb 24

RT @HamiltonMorris: The Federal Analogue Act is one of the most confusing laws in the history of American drug policy and @Jordan_S_Rubin w…

Jordan Rubin
Jordan Rubin @Jordan_S_Rubin
18 Feb 24

Hamilton Morris & Jordan Rubin discuss The Analogue Act https://t.co/PCGhFd5yLY via @YouTube