Joseph Chung

Washington, D.C., United States

Featured in: Favicon

wiley.com

mdpi.com

smithsonianmag.com Favicon

bostonglobe.com Favicon

vmware.com Favicon

science.org Favicon

modernghana.com Favicon

lexology.com Favicon

moderndiplomacy.eu Favicon

mondialisation.ca + 2 more

Articles

Unlocking New Differentiated Services at the Edge in Asia-Pacific

Aug 19, 2024 | blogs.vmware.com | Joseph Chung

All over the world, digital transformation has truly come of age—and communications service providers (CSPs) are moving fast to take advantage of all its new opportunities. We’re seeing some of the most exciting developments in the Asia Pacific and Japan (APJ) region, where enterprises are embracing data-driven technologies and solutions to reimagine their critical processes and operations; unlock new efficiencies; and boost business agility.
Court refuses to stay enforcement of award pending outcome of 2nd arbitration

Aug 8, 2024 | deacons.com | Joseph Chung |Janny Ho

View PDFAuthored by: Joseph ChungIn CF v SHK [2024] HKCFI 1493, the Hong Kong Court dismissed an application to stay enforcement of a RMB1 billion arbitral award, pending determination of a second arbitration.
Soleh Guidelines continue to apply in RHC O.73, r.10A applications

Aug 8, 2024 | deacons.com | Joseph Chung |Janny Ho

View PDFAuthored by: Joseph ChungWhere an arbitral award creditor obtains an order for enforcement of the award in Hong Kong (Enforcement Order) and the award debtor applies to set aside the Enforcement Order, the award creditor may apply under the Rules of High Court (RHC) Order 73, rule 10A for an order that the award debtor provide security for the claim before proceeding with the setting aside application.
Major changes in the 2024 CIETAC Arbitration Rules

Apr 15, 2024 | lexology.com | Joseph Chung |Vivien Wong

The 2024 CIETAC Arbitration Rules came into force on 1 January 2024. CIETAC, one of the leading PRC arbitral institutions, has incorporated a wide range of revisions in the 2024 Rules, to reflect recent developments and trends in international arbitration. The aim of the revisions is to enhance parties’ flexibility, autonomy and efficiency in CIETAC arbitrations and ensure that CIETAC arbitrations are up to international standards and expectations.
New CRCICA Arbitration Rules 2024

Apr 15, 2024 | lexology.com | Joseph Chung

The Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) Arbitration Rules 2024, came into effect on 15 January 2024.
When can an arbitral award be set aside for a tribunal’s failure to deal with an issue?

Apr 15, 2024 | lexology.com | Joseph Chung

In X & Anor v ZCo [2024] HKCFI 695, the court dismissed an application to set aside an arbitral award on the basis that the tribunal had failed to deal with certain issues. The court said that this was another case of a losing party in an arbitration coming to court to launch a challenge to an award by “repackaging” arguments which had not been made the focus of submissions to the tribunal, and presenting them to the court as key issues which had not been dealt with by the tribunal.
New CRCICA Arbitration Rules 2024

Apr 14, 2024 | deacons.com | Joseph Chung |Janny Ho

View PDFAuthored by: Joseph ChungThe Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) Arbitration Rules 2024, came into effect on 15 January 2024.
When can an arbitral award be set aside for a tribunal’s failure to deal with an issue?

Apr 14, 2024 | deacons.com | Janny Ho |Joseph Chung

View PDFAuthored by: Joseph ChungIn X & Anor v ZCo [2024] HKCFI 695, the court dismissed an application to set aside an arbitral award on the basis that the tribunal had failed to deal with certain issues.
Arbitral award found to have been obtained by fraud

Feb 8, 2024 | lexology.com | Joseph Chung

In The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments Limited [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm), a case before England’s Commercial Court, Nigeria successfully challenged arbitral awards under s.68 of England’s Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) on the basis that they had been obtained by fraud, contrary to public policy.
Arbitral award found to have been obtained by fraud

Feb 7, 2024 | deacons.com | Kristy Lai |Joseph Chung

View PDFAuthored by: Joseph ChungIn The Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments Limited [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm), a case before England’s Commercial Court, Nigeria successfully challenged arbitral awards under s.68 of England’s Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) on the basis that they had been obtained by fraud, contrary to public policy.