
Julian Jessop
Contributor at Freelance
Independent economist. Likes charts. A bit 'Brexity'. IEA Economics Fellow. Schools speaker. Diploma in Law. FRSA. COYG. Views here mine only. I fund myself...
Articles
-
1 week ago |
yahoo.com | Julian Jessop
Life is much simpler if you are willing to blame Brexit for anything that is going wrong in the British economy. This easy road attracts plenty of “likes” on social media from those who want the UK to rejoin the EU, and column inches in the Europhile press. Unfortunately, it almost always leads you down the wrong path. Take the observation that GDP per head has grown much faster since 2016 in the euro area than it has in the UK – “nearly three times as fast”, according to one cheerful commentator.
-
1 week ago |
telegraph.co.uk | Julian Jessop
Those relying on GDP per head as a measure of the impact of Brexit then have to gloss over Germany's even worse performance. Since 2016, Germany's GDP per head has grown by barely 2pc, compared to 20pc in the period between 2000 and 2016. Was that also due to Brexit? Of course not. Common factors between the UK and Germany include the difficult transition to electric vehicles, relatively high energy costs and policy choices regarding non-EU migration.
-
2 weeks ago |
substack.com | Julian Jessop
Many people are understandably still confused about the huge differences between the official figure of 'just' £3.4 billion for the cost of the Chagos deal, as cited by the Prime Minister, and other estimates which are as high as £30.3 billion. Here's my best attempt to clarify. Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. The top figure of £30.3 billion (which I first saw mentioned by The Daily Telegraph’s Tony Diver) is easiest to explain.
-
2 weeks ago |
substack.com | Julian Jessop
The larger than anticipated jump in UK inflation in April has prompted many to argue that the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee will now be much slower to cut interest rates. But there is, of course, nothing that the MPC can do now about last month’s CPI. The right question to ask is what the figures might be telling about the path of inflation in the future. The short answer is ‘not a lot’.
-
3 weeks ago |
substack.com | Julian Jessop
The first official estimates suggest that the UK economy grew by 0.7% in the first quarter of the year, which was better than most had expected. GDP per head increased by a respectable 0.5%. On the bright side, this should trigger a wave of upward revisions to growth forecasts for 2025 as a whole. (I have already nudged mine up from 1% to 1¼%.) The fading fears of a global trade war mean that the risks around these forecasts are now more evenly balanced too.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 30K
- Tweets
- 34K
- DMs Open
- No

"IMF gives Rachel Reeves political cover to ‘refine’ UK fiscal rules" (FT) 🤔 Actually, there's little substance here... 1⃣ the suggested tweaks are small and wouldn't change the rules themselves 👇 2⃣ "political cover" alone won't impress the markets! https://t.co/GlF4a3Wu9I https://t.co/19dKPvYvR3

No surprise to see the IMF revise up their UK growth forecast to 1.2% for 2025, after the 0.7% jump in Q1. But still some way to go before the economy is back on track: a year ago the IMF was predicting growth of 1.5% in 2025, and GDP rose by an even bigger 0.9% in Q1 2024... 🤔

Another reason to think that the strong growth reported in the opening months of 2025 was as good as it gets...? 🤔

☔ Has the half-term rain washed away consumer demand? As we warned after April's stellar retail sales were released last week, it looks like they just pulled forward demand from May and June instead: https://t.co/8lYoxF6CgB https://t.co/yTDsWsbnHC