Kelli Fuqua

Feb 14, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Philip M. Berkowitz |Kelli Fuqua |Meredith Schramm-Strosser

Supreme Court decision clarifies framework for whistleblowers filing claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Plaintiffs need to prove only that their whistleblower activity was a contributing factor in their termination, but still must ultimately show causation. The Supreme Court resolved a circuit split on February 8, 2024, when it issued its opinion in Murray v.

Feb 13, 2024 | littler.com | Meredith Schramm-Strosser |Kelli Fuqua |Philip M. Berkowitz

Supreme Court decision clarifies framework for whistleblowers filing claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Plaintiffs need to prove only that their whistleblower activity was a contributing factor in their termination, but still must ultimately show causation. The Supreme Court resolved a circuit split on February 8, 2024, when it issued its opinion in Murray v.

Feb 13, 2024 | lexology.com | Meredith Schramm-Strosser |Kelli Fuqua |Philip M. Berkowitz

Supreme Court decision clarifies framework for whistleblowers filing claims under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Plaintiffs need to prove only that their whistleblower activity was a contributing factor in their termination, but still must ultimately show causation. The Supreme Court resolved a circuit split on February 8, 2024, when it issued its opinion in Murray v.