Kerry Friedrichs

Jan 25, 2024 | mondaq.com | Michael Afar |Jeffrey Berman |Phillip Ebsworth |Kerry Friedrichs

Seyfarth Synopsis: On January 18, 2024, in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., the California Supreme Court addressed the split in appellate authority as to whether trial courts have inherent authority to strike a PAGA claim on the grounds that they were not manageable.

Mar 27, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Kerry Friedrichs |Alison Silveira

March 27, 2023 To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Seyfarth Synopsis: Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that employers can deduct from an employee’s PTO bank for failure to meet clearly defined productivity minimums without violating the salary basis test and jeopardizing the employee’s exempt status. Higgins v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc.

Mar 23, 2023 | lexblog.com | Alison Silveira |Kerry Friedrichs

By Alison Silveira and Kerry FriedrichsSeyfarth Synopsis: Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that employers can deduct from an employee’s PTO bank for failure to meet clearly defined productivity minimums without violating the salary basis test and jeopardizing the employee’s exempt status. Higgins v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc.

Mar 23, 2023 | wagehourlitigation.com | Alison Silveira |Kerry Friedrichs

By Alison Silveira and Kerry FriedrichsSeyfarth Synopsis: Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that employers can deduct from an employee’s PTO bank for failure to meet clearly defined productivity minimums without violating the salary basis test and jeopardizing the employee’s exempt status. Higgins v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc.

Mar 23, 2023 | lexology.com | Alison Silveira |Kerry Friedrichs

Seyfarth Synopsis: Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that employers can deduct from an employee’s PTO bank for failure to meet clearly defined productivity minimums without violating the salary basis test and jeopardizing the employee’s exempt status. Higgins v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc. provides some positive news for employers, following the Supreme Court’s recent adverse salary basis decision in Helix Energy Solutions Group v. Helix.