Lauren Castle
Correspondent at Bloomberg Law
Correspondent for @BLaw, covering IP Law | Past: @Law360, @startelegram, @azcentral & @6news | @SMU grad | Tips: [email protected]
Articles
-
1 week ago |
news.bloombergtax.com | Lauren Castle
Qualcomm Inc. didn’t convince a Texas federal judge to throw out Collabo Innovations Inc.’s patent infringement lawsuit concerning processor products. Qualcomm’s motion to dismiss is premature at the current stage of the litigation, according to an order filed Thursday in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. Judge Alan Albright said the motion is better suited at the summary judgment stage after key terms in the patent have been defined.
-
1 week ago |
news.bloomberglaw.com | Lauren Castle
Qualcomm Inc. didn’t convince a Texas federal judge to throw out Collabo Innovations Inc.’s patent infringement lawsuit concerning processor products. Qualcomm’s motion to dismiss is premature at the current stage of the litigation, according to an order filed Thursday in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. Judge Alan Albright said the motion is better suited at the summary judgment stage after key terms in the patent have been defined.
-
1 week ago |
news.bloombergtax.com | Lauren Castle |Adam Taylor
Intel Corp. convinced a Texas jury that VLSI Technology LLC is controlled by Fortress Investment Group, setting up a potential escape from more than $3 billion in patent-infringement verdicts against the chipmaker in the lengthy dispute. Fortress controls both VLSI and Finjan Inc., an Austin, Texas, jury determined Thursday .
-
1 week ago |
news.bloomberglaw.com | Lauren Castle
May 29, 2025, 6:10 PM UTC The Intel headquarters in Santa Clara, California, on April 23, 2025. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg Intel Corp. convinced a Texas jury that VLSI Technology LLC is controlled by Fortress Investment Group, setting up a potential escape from more than $3 billion in patent-infringement verdicts against the chipmaker in the lengthy dispute. Fortress controls both VLSI and Finjan Inc., an Austin, Texas, jury determined Thursday .
-
1 week ago |
news.bloomberglaw.com | Lauren Castle
Samsung Electronics Co. owes Maxell Ltd. $111.7 million for infringing patents with smart-home and phone technology, including the SmartThings Station, a jury found. Samsung willfully infringed US Patent Nos. 8,982,086, 10,176,848 and 11,017,815, a Texarkana jury determined Wednesday in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The patents concern methods for systems for video, photo, reproduction and unlocking functions. The case is Maxell Ltd. v.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 1K
- Tweets
- 9K
- DMs Open
- Yes
The decades-old medical practitioner immunity clause, designed to protect health-care providers and clinics from patent infringement while treating patients, is facing challenges across the country. @BLaw https://t.co/JDOUqM8Ufd
OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co. successfully knocked down a $10 million award after a Texas jury delievered a $1 million verdict in a damages trial concerning four Pantech Corp. patents protecting wireless technology it used in its smartphones. @BLaw https://t.co/swvzPa5BPp
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. owes Mojo Mobility Inc. $192.14 million for willfully infringing wireless charging patents by placing similar technology into its Galaxy smartphone product line, a federal jury determined Friday. @BLaw https://t.co/tl8SgoZchq