
Lawrence O. Gostin
Global Editor at JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Director @ONeillInstitute; O'Neill Chair in Global Health Law @GeorgetownLaw; Director @WHO Center on Global Health Law; Global Editor @JAMA_current; @theNASEM
Articles
-
1 week ago |
msnbc.com | Lawrence O. Gostin |Alexandra Finch
President Donald Trump’s executive order issued Monday would end federal funding for gain-of-function (GoF) research in “countries of concern.” The EO, like so many others attacking science, contains false and misleading arguments. It is mere political theater, rather than a serious plan to strengthen our preparedness for the next pandemic. The EO ends federal funding for GoF conducted by foreign entities in countries of concern, without specifying the countries other than naming China and Iran.
-
1 week ago |
yahoo.com | Lawrence O. Gostin
President Donald Trump’s executive order issued Monday would end federal funding for gain-of-function (GoF) research. The EO, like so many others attacking science, contains false and misleading arguments. It is mere political theater, rather than a serious plan to strengthen our preparedness for the next pandemic. The EO ends federal funding for GoF conducted by foreign entities in "countries of concern," without specifying the countries other than China.
-
1 week ago |
flipboard.com | Lawrence O. Gostin
2 hours ago Donald Trump Is a Man in Decline During a May 4 interview on NBC’s Meet the Press, Donald Trump was asked by moderator Kristen Welker whether he believed he was required to follow … 1 day ago Fact check: Trump claimed the US doesn’t do ‘much business with Canada.’ Canada is the world’s top buyer of US exports Washington CNN — During his Tuesday meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, President Donald Trump falsely minimized the importance of the US trade relationship...
-
1 week ago |
thehill.com | Sam F. Halabi |Lawrence O. Gostin
When President Trump issued an executive order withdrawing from the World Health Organization on his first day in office, he pledged to “identify credible and transparent United States and international partners to assume necessary activities previously undertaken by the WHO.”Since that time, the president’s supporters have doubled down on the idea that we can find an alternative to the WHO via many outlets, including this opinion page. But the truth is, we can’t and we won’t.
-
4 weeks ago |
jamanetwork.com | Lawrence O. Gostin |Jennifer Bard
PDF Full Text Share X Facebook Email LinkedIn Cite Permissions April 16, 2025 JAMA. Published online April 16, 2025.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 20K
- Tweets
- 9K
- DMs Open
- No

So, the White House endorses a lab leak as the origin of COVID-19. They make the claim absent any evidence Worse still, they ignore ample evidence of a naturally occurring animal spillover. As it does so often, the Trump administration politicizes science https://t.co/SwxRrvTTIL

Read our statement on the @WHO Pandemic Agreement from @GPHC_Panel https://t.co/CJIc9jmukj

Today in @JAMA_current, Jennifer Bard & I explore the law & policy on @NIH Indirect Rates. Our view is individually negotiated indirect rates are required by federal law. And the importance of federal/university partnerships is vital to our nation https://t.co/KIAdL2XhQJ