
Lewis Popovski
Articles
-
Jan 21, 2025 |
jdsupra.com | Lewis Popovski |Ryan Sheehan
In a recently published opinion, Judge Lorna G. Schofield (S.D.N.Y.) found that it was appropriate to compare the accused system to a plaintiff’s commercial system embodying the asserted patent claims, rather than the patent claims themselves, to show non-infringement. The court recognized that, as the Federal Circuit held in Zenith Labs. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 19 F.3d 1418, 1423 (Fed. Cir.
-
Oct 17, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Lewis Popovski |Ryan Sheehan
On October 11, 2024, Judge Orelia E. Merchant issued a decision construing the claims of three asserted patents in a litigation filed by Plaintiff Artec Europe S.A.R.L. (“Artec”) against Defendants Shenzhen Creality 3D Tech. Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Jimuyida Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Creality”). Among other disputes, Judge Merchant considered whether several claim terms were drafted in “means-plus-function” form.
-
Oct 16, 2024 |
lexology.com | Lewis Popovski |Ryan Sheehan
On October 11, 2024, Judge Orelia E. Merchant issued a decision construing the claims of three asserted patents in a litigation filed by Plaintiff Artec Europe S.A.R.L. (“Artec”) against Defendants Shenzhen Creality 3D Tech. Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Jimuyida Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Creality”). Among other disputes, Judge Merchant considered whether several claim terms were drafted in “means-plus-function” form.
-
Oct 2, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Lewis Popovski |Matthew J. Weiss
United States District Judge Pamela K. Chen (E.D.N.Y.) recently granted Plaintiff Shaf International, Inc. (“Shaf”)’s motion for summary judgment of validity of U.S. Patent No. 10,433,598 (the “’598 Patent”) and Defendant First Manufacturing Co., Inc. (“FMC”)’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement for claims 1-10 of the ’598 Patent. Slip Op. at 1.
-
Oct 2, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Lewis Popovski |Ryan Sheehan
On September 9, 2024, Judge Lewis J. Liman granted a motion to stay pending the resolution of a U.S.P.T.O. inter partes review (“IPR”) filed by Defendant Tommy John, Inc. challenging the patentability of Plaintiff Pakage Apparel, Inc.’s asserted patent.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →