
Linda Ann Bartosch
Articles
-
Jun 13, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Linda Ann Bartosch |Dale Beggs |Paul Capuano
More clearly define crypto asset regulatory boundaries for Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), providing statutory definitions for “restricted digital assets” and “digital commodities.” For the first time, give the CFTC plenary jurisdiction over spot trading in digital commodities, instead of the limited jurisdiction the CFTC now has over such spot commodities. Please see full publication below for more information.
-
May 28, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Linda Ann Bartosch |Neel Maitra |Mark D. Perlow
The United States House of Representatives voted 279-136 to pass the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (“FIT21”), on Wednesday, May 22, 2024. FIT21 is the first crypto-related legislation to clear one of the chambers of Congress, and the bipartisan support the bill has attracted in the House has led to favorable comment on its chances of passage in the Senate. FIT21 would make sweeping changes to the regulation of crypto assets, markets, and market participants.
-
May 24, 2024 |
lexology.com | Linda Ann Bartosch |Mark D. Perlow |Neel Maitra
The United States House of Representatives voted 279-136 to pass the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (“FIT21”), on Wednesday, May 22, 2024. FIT21 is the first crypto-related legislation to clear one of the chambers of Congress, and the bipartisan support the bill has attracted in the House has led to favorable comment on its chances of passage in the Senate. FIT21 would make sweeping changes to the regulation of crypto assets, markets, and market participants.
-
May 8, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Linda Ann Bartosch |Mauricio España |Ralph R. Mazzeo |Andrew P. Pontano
A long-awaited Third Circuit decision held that securitization trusts holding student loans are "covered persons" subject to the CFPB's enforcement and investigative powers because they "engage" in offering or providing consumer financial products or services. The Third Circuit's decision was rooted in the language of the trust agreement, which provided that the trusts' purpose was to "engage in" certain activities relating to the ownership of the student loans.
-
May 7, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Linda Ann Bartosch |Mauricio España |John Ludwig
May 7, 2024 Linda Ann Bartosch, Mauricio España, John Ludwig, Ralph Mazzeo, Andrew Pontano, Evan Reid, Edward Southgate Dechert LLP + Follow x Following x Following - Unfollow Contact To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: Key Takeaways A long-awaited Third Circuit decision held that securitization trusts holding student loans are “covered persons” subject to the CFPB’s enforcement and investigative powers because they “engage” in offering or providing consumer financial...
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →