Lisa Hladik

Aug 24, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Lisa Hladik |David Lee |Ed Pagano

A recent decision by Judge Beryl Howell in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“D.C. District Court”) affirmed that human authorship is required for copyright registration. In granting the United States Copyright Office’s (USCO) motion for summary judgment, the court agreed with the USCO’s denial of a copyright registration for a work created by generative artificial intelligence (AI) absent any human involvement.

Aug 24, 2023 | mondaq.com | David Vondle |Ed Pagano |David Lee |Lisa Hladik

A recent decision by Judge Beryl Howell in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ("D.C. District Court") affirmed that human authorship is required for copyright registration. In granting the United States Copyright Office's (USCO) motion for summary judgment, the court agreed with the USCO's denial of a copyright registration for a work created by generative artificial intelligence (AI) absent any human involvement.

Aug 23, 2023 | lexology.com | David Vondle |Ed Pagano |David Lee |Lisa Hladik

A recent decision by Judge Beryl Howell in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“D.C. District Court”) affirmed that human authorship is required for copyright registration. In granting the United States Copyright Office’s (USCO) motion for summary judgment, the court agreed with the USCO’s denial of a copyright registration for a work created by generative artificial intelligence (AI) absent any human involvement.

Aug 23, 2023 | akingump.com | David Vondle |Ed Pagano |David Lee |Lisa Hladik

By: David C. Vondle, Ed Pagano, David C. Lee, Lisa C. Hladik A recent decision by Judge Beryl Howell in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“D.C. District Court”) affirmed that human authorship is required for copyright registration.

Jul 28, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Lisa Hladik |David Lee |David Vondle

The recent expansion of the scope and capabilities of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and platforms has introduced a number of legal challenges. These challenges can represent a double-edged sword, both for those seeking copyright protection and those accused of copyright infringement involving works and materials created using generative AI tools and platforms.