Articles

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →

X (formerly Twitter)

Followers
6K
Tweets
13K
DMs Open
No
Marc Edelman
Marc Edelman @MarcEdelman
23 Apr 25

I am certainly not trying to force anyone to watch this. But, 90 percent of the cold calls and cold emails I have received this week about #NCAA rules and #antitrust law are answered in this short presentation:

Marc Edelman
Marc Edelman @MarcEdelman

For anyone interested in watching my presentation from the 2025 Sports Economics Conference on "Why the House Settlement Won't Solve the NCAA's Antitrust Problems," click on the YouTube video below, forward to the 7:00 mark and pump up the audio. #NCAA https://t.co/zNbDo1Euvo

Marc Edelman
Marc Edelman @MarcEdelman
23 Apr 25

For all of the noise on all sides about the proposed House v NCAA settlement, this is just a reminder that parties could have legally agreed to all of this stuff and more if only it happened in the context of a bona fide collective bargaining relationship (which it didn’t).

Marc Edelman
Marc Edelman @MarcEdelman
22 Apr 25

While the above statement may be true, it is also important to remember that the standard for a plaintiff to prevail on a TRO or preliminary injunction motion is likely success on the merits + irreparable harm. After those stages, irreparable harm is no longer an element.

Chris Vannini
Chris Vannini @ChrisVannini

The NCAA has had a good stretch in court over eligibility in recent months. A few players like Diego Pavia have gotten an extra year, but the concerns over someone potentially suing their way to unlimited eligibility haven't materialized yet.