
Marc Edelman
Senior Contributor at Forbes
Tenured Law Professor. Fulbright Scholar. Sports Ethics Director. Attorney. Former Skadden. I write on Antitrust, IP, Higher Ed and Sports. [email protected]
Articles
-
1 month ago |
forbes.com | Marc Edelman
(This piece is coauthored with civil rights attorney Sherif Moussa). For over half a century, the New York Yankees facial hair policy stood as one of the hallmarks of the franchise. But last week, in a statement from Yankees Managing Partner Hal Steinbrenner, the team abolished the rule. Indeed, the policy had long overstayed its welcome to the extent it was ever appropriate.
-
Mar 27, 2024 |
idahopress.com | Nathaniel Grow |John Holden |Marc Edelman
Secure transaction. Cancel anytime.
-
Mar 27, 2024 |
caledonianrecord.com | Marc Edelman |Baruch College
-
Mar 27, 2024 |
thederrick.com | Nathaniel Grow |John Holden |Marc Edelman
-
Mar 27, 2024 |
theconversation.com | Nathaniel Grow |John Holden |Marc Edelman
During spring training, Major League Baseball’s official uniform supplier, Fanatics, became a focal point for all the wrong reasons. After arriving in Florida and Arizona, players began to complain about the quality of their new, Fanatics-manufactured uniforms.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 6K
- Tweets
- 13K
- DMs Open
- No

I am certainly not trying to force anyone to watch this. But, 90 percent of the cold calls and cold emails I have received this week about #NCAA rules and #antitrust law are answered in this short presentation:

For anyone interested in watching my presentation from the 2025 Sports Economics Conference on "Why the House Settlement Won't Solve the NCAA's Antitrust Problems," click on the YouTube video below, forward to the 7:00 mark and pump up the audio. #NCAA https://t.co/zNbDo1Euvo

For all of the noise on all sides about the proposed House v NCAA settlement, this is just a reminder that parties could have legally agreed to all of this stuff and more if only it happened in the context of a bona fide collective bargaining relationship (which it didn’t).

While the above statement may be true, it is also important to remember that the standard for a plaintiff to prevail on a TRO or preliminary injunction motion is likely success on the merits + irreparable harm. After those stages, irreparable harm is no longer an element.

The NCAA has had a good stretch in court over eligibility in recent months. A few players like Diego Pavia have gotten an extra year, but the concerns over someone potentially suing their way to unlimited eligibility haven't materialized yet.