
Mark Hamilton
Articles
-
Oct 28, 2024 |
lexology.com | Mark Hamilton |Claire Maclean
What is suitable alternative employment? An employer dismissing an employee by reason of redundancy has a duty to make reasonable efforts to find the employee alternative employment. That would usually involve an at-risk employee being notified of all available roles for them to consider as an alternative to being made redundant. However, if the employee unreasonably refuses to accept a suitable alternative role, they will lose their entitlement to a statutory redundancy payment. What is suitable?
-
Oct 17, 2024 |
lexology.com | Mark Hamilton |Karen Farrell
The tipping landscape is undergoing significant change with new non-statutory guidance from the UK government aimed at promoting fair distribution of tips between employees. This aligns with the introduction of the Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 and the Code of Practice on Fair and Transparent Distribution of Tips, effective from 1 October 2024. What is the purpose of the reform?
-
Oct 4, 2024 |
lexology.com | Leslie M. Martin |Mark Hamilton
In a landmark decision, the Employment Tribunal (ET) in Thandi and others v. Next Retail Limited and another found that, by paying its warehouse staff a higher rate of basic pay than shop floor staff, Next was in breach of the equal pay provisions of the Equality Act 2010 (EA), which imply a “sex equality clause” into every contract of employment. Other retailers are involved in large-scale equal pay litigation on similar points, but this appears to be the first to reach a conclusion in the ET.
-
Oct 3, 2024 |
lexology.com | Mark Hamilton |Sarah Britton
The Supreme Court’s highly anticipated judgment in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v. Professional Game Match Officials Ltd. determined that the “irreducible minimum” of mutuality of obligation and control necessary for employment contracts were present in individual match contracts of part-time football referees officiating English domestic matches.
-
Sep 3, 2024 |
lexology.com | Amy Gordon |Mark Hamilton
In a recent High Court ruling, an application for an interim injunction aimed at enforcing restrictive covenants was swiftly dismissed, illustrating the court’s reluctance to uphold extreme covenants. Literacy Capital Plc (the Claimant), an investment company, sought to prevent Vanessa Webb (the Defendant), a former director of the Claimant’s subsidiary, Mountain Healthcare, from engaging in activities that were deemed competitive with Mountain Healthcare’s business.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →