
Matthew A. Seligman
Articles
-
Oct 16, 2024 |
lrb.co.uk | Lawrence Lessig |Matthew A. Seligman |Colin Kidd
‘The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.’ The tweet came in the early hours of 7 November 2012, when it seemed likely that the Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, who had lost the electoral college to Barack Obama, might end up ahead of Obama in the popular vote. In a further message, subsequently deleted, the same tweeter added that Obama had ‘lost the popular vote by a lot and won the election.
-
Oct 1, 2024 |
nytimes.com | Matthew A. Seligman
On Tuesday night, JD Vance will face Tim Walz in what is likely to be the only vice-presidential debate of the 2024 election. As American voters assess Mr. Vance, they should scrutinize whether he has demonstrated the fundamental fidelity to the Constitution that the office requires. Before and after his selection as Donald Trump's running mate, Mr. Vance said repeatedly that if he had been vice president on Jan. 6, 2021, he would have intervened in the electoral count in favor of President Trump.
-
Sep 2, 2024 |
justsecurity.org | Norman Eisen |Matthew A. Seligman |E. Danya Perry |Joshua Kolb
Late on Friday night, Special Counsel Jack Smith and former President Donald Trump submitted a joint status report detailing their clashing proposals for how the prosecution of the former president for his attempt to reverse the results of the 2020 election should proceed. The report comes just days after the government filed a superseding indictment.
-
Aug 6, 2024 |
justsecurity.org | Norman Eisen |Matthew A. Seligman |Joshua Kolb
I. IntroductionII. The Supreme Court’s Immunity FrameworkIII. Applying the Court’s Immunity Decision to the Indictment1. Undisputed Unofficial Conduct2. Alternate Electors Scheme3. Public Statements4. Pressuring State Officials5. Vice President Pence Plan6. Conduct Related to the Congressional Count on January 67. Pressuring the Department of JusticeIV.
-
Jun 29, 2024 |
msnbc.com | Matthew A. Seligman |Joshua Kolb |Norman Eisen
The news that the Supreme Court ruled Friday in favor of a Jan. 6 defendant’s bid to narrow the scope of a charge against him and other rioters has been treated in some quarters as a breakthrough for them — and for former president Donald Trump. But that reaction is misguided. Yes, the court, in Fischer v. United States, narrowed the government’s expansive approach to Section 1512(c)(2), which makes it a crime to obstruct an official proceeding.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →