
Michael Clancy
Articles
-
Oct 30, 2024 |
concurrences.com | Van Bael |Michael Clancy |Peter L'Ecluse |Catherine Longeval
European Commission Imposes Heavy Fine on Teva for Misuse of Patent System and Disparaging Rival’s Product*Today, the European Commission (the Commission) fined Teva EUR 462.6 million for abusing its dominant position to delay the market entry of rival medicines for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (see, attached press release and statement). The Commission established that Teva artificially delayed competition and extended the patent protection of its product Copaxone®...
-
Oct 30, 2024 |
concurrences.com | Van Bael |Michael Clancy |Peter L'Ecluse |Catherine Longeval
European Commission Imposes Heavy Fine on Teva for Misuse of Patent System and Disparaging Rival’s Product*Today, the European Commission (the Commission) fined Teva EUR 462.6 million for abusing its dominant position to delay the market entry of rival medicines for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (see, attached press release and statement). The Commission established that Teva artificially delayed competition and extended the patent protection of its product Copaxone®...
-
Oct 9, 2024 |
concurrences.com | Van Bael |Michael Clancy |Peter L'Ecluse |Catherine Longeval
Previous article Next article Share on | The Swiss Competition Authority ( Competition Commission or Comco ) indicated today that it terminated its inquiry into patent litigation conducted by Novartis to protect Cosentyx®, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of several autoimmune diseases, including specific dermatological conditions (see, attached press release in four language versions). Both Comco and the European Commission (the Commission ) had sought to learn...
-
Sep 2, 2024 |
concurrences.com | Van Bael |Michael Clancy |Peter L'Ecluse |Valérie Lefever
Previous article Next article Share on | Yesterday, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU ) set aside the judgment in which the General Court ( GC ) had confirmed the competence of the European Commission (the Commission ) to review (and ultimately prohibit) the acquisition of Grail by Illumina and annulled the Commission’s decisions to accept to review this case following referral requests by France and other Member States (CJEU, judgment of 3 September in...
-
Sep 2, 2024 |
concurrences.com | Van Bael |Michael Clancy |Peter L'Ecluse |Valérie Lefever
Yesterday, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the CJEU ) set aside the judgment in which the General Court ( GC ) had confirmed the competence of the European Commission (the Commission ) to review (and ultimately prohibit) the acquisition of Grail by Illumina and annulled the Commission’s decisions to accept to review this case following referral requests by France and other Member States (CJEU, judgment of 3 September in Joined Cases C-611/22 P and C-625/22 P...
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →