Articles

  • Nov 26, 2024 | msnbc.com | Niko Lusiani |Ketan Ahuja

    The last few months have been tough for Google. After a judge held the company illegally monopolized online search, the Justice Department just proposed remedies, including forcing Google to sell its Chrome web browser, prohibiting exclusive search engine licensing deals and self-preferencing, obliging the company to license its data and web index more broadly and limiting its control over the evolving artificial intelligence industry.

  • Nov 26, 2024 | washingtonmonthly.com | Niko Lusiani

    The election results have sparked a palpable sense of anticipation, if not outright salivation, among corporate leaders, predicting a surge in consolidation, particularly in sectors like tech, media, and finance under the incoming administration. This renewed optimism over mergers and acquisitions is fueled by expectations of a pullback of the Biden administration’s vigorous regulatory and legal enforcement of antitrust law.

  • Sep 19, 2024 | rooseveltinstitute.org | Niko Lusiani |Lauren Melodia |Kristina Karlsson |Felicia Wong

    I. IntroductionThe United States is in the beginning stages of a momentous energy transition. In the next few decades, our country must move away from an arcane, centralized, fossil fuel–based energy system and toward a more decentralized, renewable system promising to “electrify everything”—from heating, to cooking, to transport, to data processing, and beyond.

  • Jun 28, 2024 | rooseveltinstitute.org | Niko Lusiani

    Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States chose not to blow up the tax code. In Moore v. US, seven justices upheld the constitutionality of a tax on foreign income, known as the Mandatory Repatriation Tax. In a brief last September, my coauthors and I argued that the provision, passed as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, was as constitutional as it was overly generous to US multinational companies.

  • Jun 27, 2024 | rooseveltinstitute.org | Ketan Ahuja |Niko Lusiani |Emily DiVito

    IntroductionInnovation is key to improving economic growth and people’s standard of living. Approaches to antitrust should therefore focus on mitigating harms to innovation, in addition to “static” welfare measures like prices. Yet while antitrust cases often mention innovation, litigators rarely center cases around it, and courts almost never intervene in the name of harms to innovation.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →