
Parul Sehgal
Critic-at-Large at The New York Times
Staff writer, @newyorker. Formerly, book critic @nytimesbooks
Articles
-
1 month ago |
businessandamerica.com | Parul Sehgal
In conversation with Page, Schulman explained that the speech was approved by Kelly’s partner and friends and delivered in the spirit of the political funerals during the thick of the AIDS pandemic; she wanted to dispel the fantasy of suicide as any kind of solution. She took questions from those in the audience who had feltwounded or angered.
-
1 month ago |
nytimes.com | Parul Sehgal
The Trump administration has declared a war on words - some 200 of them and counting. Reporting by The Times found that words like "inclusion" and "identity" have been flagged by agencies, with instruction to avoid them or even remove them from government websites and curriculums, part of the wider initiative to scrub diversity and inclusion initiatives from public life. Some words under scrutiny are so neutral they invite surprise ("belong," "women").
-
Oct 14, 2024 |
newyorker.com | Parul Sehgal
It is a truth only fitfully acknowledged that whom the gods wish to destroy, they first give an opinion column. “A live coffin,” a former newspaper colleague of mine once called hers. (She quit.) Such a space seems an impossible remit, created to coax out vague, vatic pronouncements as the writer, mind wrung dry of ideas, sets about a weary pantomime of thinking and feeling, outrage and offense. Few writers have seemed as aware of the hazards of professional opinion-mongering as Ta-Nehisi Coates.
-
Sep 9, 2024 |
newyorker.com | Parul Sehgal
Pain, it has been said, is the great censor, the eater of words. Pain shatters language; it remains untranslatable—not just anti-narrative but pre-narrative, calling us back to our first sounds.
-
Aug 5, 2024 |
newyorker.com | Parul Sehgal
Why do you stay? a neighbor asks, listening to her litany. After a screaming fight, after John admits that he cannot contribute to the joint bank account that month, after Jane cries “from the deepest part of the pain tank,” she admits, “I understood why people divorce.” The reader’s heart lifts—see Jane run?—but then drops, realizing that there are more than two hundred pages to go. Eventually, it’s John who will leave, for another woman, and Jane who will beg him to stay.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 57K
- Tweets
- 5K
- DMs Open
- Yes

RT @rozina_ali: On the other side of Signalgate were actual people who died in Yemen from US airstrikes. I wrote about a family that lost 1…

RT @_Floodlight: This is the single largest attack on American labor in the last 80 years. We’re talking hundreds of thousands of people.

RT @silversfound: Less than five days remain to apply for a Silvers Grant! Receive up to $10,000 to support your work. Apply now at https:/…