Peter Levin

Nov 11, 2024 | finnpartners.com | Peter Levin

News and Insights November 11, 2024 Every season has its traditions. This past summer, I decided to break with one of my own. Instead of watching the classic movie “Jaws,” I thought it would be cool to go to the source material – so I read the book by Peter Benchley. Aside from being the least scary book I’ve ever read (“Salem’s Lot”…”It”…not even close!), it reminded me of something I do in my marketing and advertising career.

Sep 29, 2024 | spectrum.ieee.org | John Allen |Peter Levin

In 1956 Henry Kissinger speculated in Foreign Affairs about how the nuclear stalemate between the United States and the Soviet Union could force national security officials into a terrible dilemma. His thesis was that the United States risked sending a signal to potential aggressors that, faced with conflict, defense officials would have only two choices: settle for peace at any price, or retaliate with thermonuclear ruin.

Sep 29, 2024 | evdriven.com | John Allen |Peter Levin

In 1956 Henry Kissinger speculated in Foreign Affairs about how the nuclear stalemate between the United States and the Soviet Union could force national security officials into a terrible dilemma. His thesis was that the United States risked sending a signal to potential aggressors that, faced with conflict, defense officials would have only two choices: settle for peace at any price, or retaliate with thermonuclear ruin.

Jan 29, 2024 | cnas.org | Sam Howell |Peter Levin |Noah Feldman Greene |Vivek Chilukuri

Today, there is a grave and growing gap in Washington’s long-term analysis: technology competition. Although the ONA has done laudable analyses of key technology trends, its focus on how those trends specifically affect the U.S. military misses the ever-expanding role technology plays in national and economic security.

Jan 25, 2024 | cnas.org | Peter Levin |Samuel Bendett |Noah Feldman Greene

Under the law, AI systems are categorised into four groups. In the bottom tier, systems viewed as having minimal or no risk simply must comply with existing regulation. Second are systems viewed as having limited risk or transparency risk. These are products which pose a noticeable threat to European fundamental rights, as a result additional transparency obligations would be required.