Rachel Rothwell
Freelance Journalist at Freelance
Journo writing news & analysis across legal press. Editor of Litigation Funding, PI Focus; columnist @lawsocgazette. [email protected]. Personal views
Articles
-
1 month ago |
lawgazette.co.uk | Rachel Rothwell
2025 is a critical year for litigation funders on several fronts. They are right to be worried, reports Rachel RothwellAll eyes are on the litigation funding industry as the Civil Justice Council undertakes a review of the sector. Major changes could be on the cards, including statutory regulation, caps on funding returns and a duty to disclose the presence of funding.
-
1 month ago |
lawgazette.co.uk | Rachel Rothwell
The senior judiciary is on the lookout for a magic money tree. The April 2013 Jackson reforms sought to get a grip on legal costs through proportionality and costs budgeting. Unfortunately for claimants, however, they also put an end to recoverable success fees and after-the-event insurance premiums. That has damaged the ability of lawyers to act under ‘no win, no fee’ agreements, and left many people unable to access the courts.
-
1 month ago |
lawgazette.co.uk | Rachel Rothwell
The regulatory framework for litigation funding is ‘out of step with the commercial realities’ and ‘urgent reforms’ are needed, according to a network of class representatives chaired by Walter Merricks CBE. A submission to the Civil Justice Council’s review of litigation funding by the Class Representatives Network (CRN), based on evidence from around half of its 42 members and written by its legal and policy officer Rhea Gupta, highlights the network's concerns.
-
1 month ago |
lawgazette.co.uk | Rachel Rothwell
Lawyers, funders and academics have called for urgent legislation to reverse the effects of the PACCAR Supreme Courtruling as the Civil Justice Council’s litigation funding consultation closed this week. Litigation firm Stewarts, the Collective Redress Lawyers Association (CORLA), academics from the University of Oxford and funding industry bodies were among those pressing for urgent action in their submissions to the CJC.
-
1 month ago |
lawgazette.co.uk | Rachel Rothwell
Lawyers, funders and academics have called for urgent legislation to reverse the effects of the PACCAR ruling as the Civil Justice Council’s litigation funding consultation closed this week. Litigation firm Stewarts, the Collective Redress Lawyers Association (CORLA), academics from the University of Oxford and funding industry bodies were among those pressing for urgent action in their submissions to the CJC.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 5K
- Tweets
- 6K
- DMs Open
- No
RT @mdcomms: Don't miss the latest edition of Litigation Funding! 🎉 Edited by the fab @LawJourno, the magazine is packed full of analysis…
This morning I’m at @CLR-CONFERENCE with a packed agenda, kicking off with a keynote speech from Lord Justice Dingemans #clrconf
What to expect from the CJC's review of #litigationfunding - see my latest column in the digital Law Society Gazette: https://t.co/CIbPyP7YVx https://t.co/xJaEWESf6F