Raphael Lataster

5 days ago | dailysceptic.org | Raphael Lataster

The hugely influential study on COVID-19 vaccines, Watson et al., which was used by experts throughout the pandemic to show that the jabs saved tens of millions of lives in one year, has been thoroughly debunked, by yours truly (a misinformation researcher now primarily focused on COVID-19, not least because of being fired for refusing the jab and winning subsequent legal cases), with the critique finally published in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

3 weeks ago | sgtreport.com | Raphael Lataster

by Dr Raphael Lataster, Daily Sceptic:A major study has been published in the Paediatrics journal, apparently showing that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe in pregnancy (Rowe et al.), but my background in analytic philosophy, which is very useful in pointing out flaws in arguments, keeps preventing me from accepting these sorts of studies as gospel – and in one of those rare cases the prestigious journal let me have my say.

3 weeks ago | dailysceptic.org | Raphael Lataster

A major study has been published in the Paediatrics journal, apparently showing that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe in pregnancy (Rowe et al.), but my background in analytic philosophy, which is very useful in pointing out flaws in arguments, keeps preventing me from accepting these sorts of studies as gospel – and in one of those rare cases the prestigious journal let me have my say.

Jan 27, 2025 | dailysceptic.org | Raphael Lataster

Springer Nature medical journal Cureus, which has published some good stuff on COVID-19 lately (even if it did retract Mead et al.), has just published a peer-reviewed article (Lataster and Parry) on the corruption of major medical journals and the need for those in the science game to entertain contrarian ideas. The authors are yours truly (University of Sydney) and the always delightful Peter Parry (University of Queensland).